Publication:
High-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trial

dc.contributor.authorSurat Tongyooen_US
dc.contributor.authorPorntipa Tantibunditen_US
dc.contributor.authorKiattichai Daorattanachaien_US
dc.contributor.authorTanuwong Viarasilpaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChairat Permpikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuthipol Udompanturaken_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Thammasat Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKhon Kaen Regional Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:02:08Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:02:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: High-flow nasal oxygen cannula (HFNC) and noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) can prevent reintubation in critically ill patients. However, their efficacy in post-extubated sepsis patients remains unclear. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of HFNC vs. NIV to prevent reintubation in post-extubated sepsis patients. Methods: We conducted a single-centre, prospective, open-labelled, randomised controlled trial at the medical intensive care unit of Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Sepsis patients who had been intubated, recovered, and passed the spontaneous breathing trial were enrolled and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either HFNC or NIV support immediately after extubation. The primary outcome was rate of reintubation at 72 h after extubation. Results: Between 1st October 2017 and 31st October 2019, 222 patients were enrolled and 112 were assigned to the HFNC group and 110 to the NIV group. Both groups were well matched in baseline characteristics. The median [IQR] age of the HFNC group was 66 [50–77] vs. 65.5 [54–77] years in the NIV group. The most common causes of intubation at admission were shock-related respiratory failure (57.1% vs. 55.5%) and acute hypoxic respiratory failure (34.8% vs. 40.9%) in the HFNC and NIV groups, respectively. The duration of mechanical ventilation before extubation was 5 [3–8] days in the HFNC group vs. 5 [3–9] days in the NIV group. There was no statistically significant difference in the primary outcome: 20/112 (17.9%) in the HFNC group required reintubation at 72 h compared to 20/110 (18.2%) in the NIV group [relative risk (RR) 0.99: 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.70–1.39); P = 0.95]. The 28-day mortality was not different: 8/112 (7.1%) with HFNC vs. 10/110 (9.1%) with NIV (RR 0.88: 95% CI (0.57–1.37); P = 0.59). Conclusions: Among sepsis patients, there was no difference between HFNC and NIV in the prevention of reintubation at 72 h after extubation. Clinical Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246893; Registered 11 August 2017; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03246893?term=surat+tongyoo&draw=2&rank=3en_US
dc.identifier.citationAnnals of Intensive Care. Vol.11, No.1 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13613-021-00922-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn21105820en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85114860599en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77528
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114860599&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleHigh-flow nasal oxygen cannula vs. noninvasive mechanical ventilation to prevent reintubation in sepsis: a randomized controlled trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85114860599&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections