Publication:
A national hospital-based survey of snakes responsible for bites in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorChaisin Viravanen_US
dc.contributor.authorSornchai Looareesuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWaipot Kosakamen_US
dc.contributor.authorVanapom Wuthiekanunen_US
dc.contributor.authorColin J. McCarthyen_US
dc.contributor.authorAndrew F. Stimsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDanai Bunnagen_US
dc.contributor.authorTranakchit Harinasutaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavid A. Warrellen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrapokklao Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Natural History Museum, Londonen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-10T08:45:37Z
dc.date.available2018-08-10T08:45:37Z
dc.date.issued1992-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractSnakes which had been killed and brought to hospital with the patients they had bitten were collected in 80 district and provincial hospitals throughout 67 provinces in Thailand in order to establish the geographical distribution and relative medical importance of the venomous species. Of the 1631 snakes collected, 1145 were venomous: Malayan pit vipers (Calloselasma rhodostoma), green pit vipers (Trimeresurus albolabris) and Russell’s vipers (Daboia russelii) were the most numerous, while T. albolabris, C. rhodostoma and spitting cobras (‘Naja atra’) were the most widely distributed. In 22 cases, non-venomous species were mistaken for venomous ones and antivenom was used unnecessarily. The Malayan krait (Bungarus candidus) was confused with B. fasciatus in 5 cases and B. fasciatus antivenom was used inappropriately. The study extended the known ranges of most of the medically-important venomous species in Thailand. Correct identification of venomous snakes is especially important in Thailand because the locally-produced antivenoms are monospecific. The technique of hospital-based collection, labelling and preservation of dead snakes brought by bitten patients is recommended when rapid assessment of a country’s medically important herpetofauna is required. © Oxford University Press.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. Vol.86, No.1 (1992), 100-106en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0035-9203(92)90463-Men_US
dc.identifier.issn18783503en_US
dc.identifier.issn00359203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0026569492en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/22316
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0026569492&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleA national hospital-based survey of snakes responsible for bites in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0026569492&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections