Publication: Intestinal tuberculosis or Crohn’s disease: a review of the diagnostic models designed to differentiate between these two gastrointestinal diseases
10
Issued Date
2021-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
22881956
15989100
15989100
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85097457350
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Intestinal Research. Vol.19, No.1 (2021), 21-32
Suggested Citation
Julajak Limsrivilai, Nonthalee Pausawasdi Intestinal tuberculosis or Crohn’s disease: a review of the diagnostic models designed to differentiate between these two gastrointestinal diseases. Intestinal Research. Vol.19, No.1 (2021), 21-32. doi:10.5217/IR.2019.09142 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/78874
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Intestinal tuberculosis or Crohn’s disease: a review of the diagnostic models designed to differentiate between these two gastrointestinal diseases
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Differentiating Crohn’s disease (CD) from intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) is a diagnostic dilemma, particularly in regions where ITB is prevalent and CD incidence is increasing, because both diseases can present quite similarly, and diagnostic tests to identify Mycobacterium tuberculosis in tissue samples have rather poor sensitivity. Studies that were conducted to determine the factors that differentiate CD from ITB identified some significant characteristics, but none of those characteristics are exclusive to either ITB or CD. Many diagnostic models or scoring systems that use one to several diagnostic parameters have been proposed to help distinguish these two intestinal diseases. Early models consisted of parameters common to routine clinical practice, such as clinical features, and endoscopic and pathologic findings. The later models also include more advanced diagnostic parameters like high-resolution imaging and serological testing. However, the number and types of parameters differ among diagnostic models, and the systems used to calculate scoring also vary from model to model. Enhanced awareness and understanding of the currently available diagnostic models will help physicians determine which model(s) is/are most suitable for differentiating CD from ITB in their clinical practice. (Intest Res 2021;19:21-32)