Publication: Genotypic resistance mutations in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients under widespread use of antiretroviral drugs in Thailand: Implications for further epidemiologic surveillance
4
Issued Date
2007-10-09
Resource Type
ISSN
13446304
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-34948875352
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. Vol.60, No.5 (2007), 284-289
Suggested Citation
Chonlaphat Sukasem, Vina Churdboonchart, Kanjana Sirisidthi, Suda Riengrojpitak, Sanchai Chasombat, Chotip Watitpun, Wantanich Piroj, Montip Tiensuwan, Wasun Chantratita Genotypic resistance mutations in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients under widespread use of antiretroviral drugs in Thailand: Implications for further epidemiologic surveillance. Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases. Vol.60, No.5 (2007), 284-289. Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/24719
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Genotypic resistance mutations in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients under widespread use of antiretroviral drugs in Thailand: Implications for further epidemiologic surveillance
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
The aims of this study were to illustrate the prevalence and determinants of mutations associated with antiretroviral drug resistance in a group of antiretroviral-naïve and treatment-experienced patients in Thailand, where antiretroviral drugs are widely used. One hundred and thirteen treatment-naïve (92 CRF01Æ and 21 subtype B patients) and 1,709 treatment-experienced patients were recruited. Genotypic resistance to antiretroviral drugs was studied by sequencing the isolated viruses. Mutation frequencies in treatment-naïve patients were reported along with those for treatment-experienced patients. The results showed that all of the patients with treatment experience showed the same pattern of genotypic resistance. The results also showed that only 14 drug-naïve patients (12.4%) carried HIV-1, with at least-one drug-resistant mutation. Moreover, four drug-naïve patients were found to carry the marker mutations for transmission of drug resistance. The most commonly found marker in drug-naïve patients was M36I/V/L (n = 90, 81.1%), which is a common natural polymorphism among HIV-1 subtype CRF01Æ individuals. In order to prevent the rapid emergence of resistant virus strains, a national program to monitor antiretroviral drug resistance should be established. We also recommend routine genotypic testing in treatment-naïve patients before starting antiretroviral therapy to prevent subtherapeutic response and viral failure.