Publication:
In-person verification of deep learning algorithm for diabetic retinopathy screening using different techniques across fundus image devices

dc.contributor.authorNida Wongchaisuwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorAdisak Trinavaraten_US
dc.contributor.authorNuttawut Rodananten_US
dc.contributor.authorSomanus Thoongsuwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNopasak Phasukkijwatanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupalert Prakhunhungsiten_US
dc.contributor.authorLukana Preechasuken_US
dc.contributor.authorPapis Wongchaisuwaten_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherKasetsart Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:34:42Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:34:42Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the clinical performance of an automated diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening model to detect referable cases at Siriraj Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. Methods: A retrospective review of two sets of fundus photographs (Eidon and Nidek) was undertaken. The images were classified by DR staging prior to the development of a DR screening model. In a prospective cross-sectional enrollment of patients with diabetes, automated detection of referable DR was compared with the results of the gold standard, a dilated fundus examination. Results: The study analyzed 2533 Nidek fundus images and 1989 Eidon images. The sensitivities calculated for the Nidek and Eidon images were 0.93 and 0.88 and the specificities were 0.91 and 0.85, respectively. In a clinical verification phase using 982 Nidek and 674 Eidon photographs, the calculated sensitivities and specificities were 0.86 and 0.92 for Nidek along with 0.92 and 0.84 for Eidon, respectively. The 60°-field images from the Eidon yielded a more desirable performance in differentiating referable DR than did the corresponding images from the Nidek. Conclusions: A conventional fundus examination requires intense healthcare resources. It is time consuming and possibly leads to unavoidable human errors. The deep learning algorithm for the detection of referable DR exhibited a favorable performance and is a promising alternative for DR screening. However, variations in the color and pixels of photographs can cause differences in sensitivity and specificity. The image angle and poor quality of fundus photographs were the main limitations of the automated method. Translational Relevance: The deep learning algorithm, developed from basic research of image processing, was applied to detect referable DR in a real-word clinical care setting.en_US
dc.identifier.citationTranslational Vision Science and Technology. Vol.10, No.13 (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1167/TVST.10.13.17en_US
dc.identifier.issn21642591en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85121034792en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76923
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121034792&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleIn-person verification of deep learning algorithm for diabetic retinopathy screening using different techniques across fundus image devicesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85121034792&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections