Publication:
Randomized investigator-blinded comparative study of moisturizer containing 4-t-butylcyclohexanol and licochalcone A versus 0.02% triamcinolone acetonide cream in facial dermatitis

dc.contributor.authorWaranya Boonchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorSupenya Varothaien_US
dc.contributor.authorWaranaree Winayanuwattikunen_US
dc.contributor.authorSutasinee Phaitoonvatanakijen_US
dc.contributor.authorPichanee Chaweekulraten_US
dc.contributor.authorPranee Kasemsarnen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:33:05Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:33:05Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Background: Facial dermatitis can result from various conditions, some of which are of a chronic and relapsing nature. The use of topical corticosteroid therapy may lead to additional adverse effects. Objective: To compare the efficacy of moisturizer containing 4-t-butylcyclohexanol, which acts as a sensitivity regulator, and licochalcone A, an anti-inflammatory agent from the licorice plant Glycyrrhiza inflata, with that of 0.02% triamcinolone acetonide (TA) for the treatment of facial dermatitis. Methods: This was a randomized, prospective, investigator-blinded study. Eighty participants with mild to moderate facial dermatitis were randomly treated with either the test facial moisturizer or 0.02% TA twice daily for the first 2 weeks. For the subsequent 2 weeks, all patients used only the test moisturizer. Clinical assessment by investigators, bioengineering measurements, patients' subjective evaluation, and clinical photography were performed at baseline, week 2, and week 4. Results: Both treatments showed a statistically significant improvement with regard to physician clinical assessment, skin hydration, transepidermal water loss, and patient-assessed visual analog scale after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment compared with baseline. The test facial moisturizer produced better skin hydration than TCS. The improvement in TEWL after 4 weeks of using the test moisturizer was comparable with 2-week treatment with 0.02% TA cream. However, subjective evaluation by patients indicated that TA more rapidly improved sensation sensitivity. Conclusion: The test facial moisturizer was slower than 0.02% TA in improving facial dermatitis, but showed greater benefit in erythema control and skin hydration.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology. Vol.17, No.6 (2018), 1130-1135en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocd.12499en_US
dc.identifier.issn14732165en_US
dc.identifier.issn14732130en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85041584389en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46145
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041584389&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleRandomized investigator-blinded comparative study of moisturizer containing 4-t-butylcyclohexanol and licochalcone A versus 0.02% triamcinolone acetonide cream in facial dermatitisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041584389&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections