Publication:
Phenotypic investigation of regenerated epithelial cells after gonococcal corneal perforation: A clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical study

dc.contributor.authorPassara Jongkhajornpongen_US
dc.contributor.authorTakahiro Nakamuraen_US
dc.contributor.authorChie Sotozonoen_US
dc.contributor.authorTsutomu Inatomien_US
dc.contributor.authorShigeru Kinoshitaen_US
dc.contributor.otherKyoto Prefectural University of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-23T10:33:27Z
dc.date.available2018-11-23T10:33:27Z
dc.date.issued2015-10-09en_US
dc.description.abstractCopyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Purpose: To determine the characteristics of regenerated epithelial cells after severe gonococcal infection after corneal perforation. Methods: Pathological tissue was obtained from the cornea at the time of surgery. Hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical analysis were performed for cytoskeletal keratins (K12, K13, and K15), basement membrane and junctional markers (laminin 5, ZO-1 and Desmoplakin), and proliferative and mesenchymal markers (Ki67, α-SMA, and vimentin). Results: A 42-year-old patient with severe gonococcal keratoconjunctivitis rapidly progressed to corneal perforation during administration of intensive topical and systemic antibiotics. After conservative treatment, the perforation healed and 5- × 3-mm corneal ectasia occurred with localized iris attachment. Complete closure of the cornea was confirmed by a negative Seidel test. After lamellar keratoplasty to improve corneal integrity and to prevent secondary glaucoma, the pathological tissue revealed a poorly organized epithelial layer at the regenerated ectatic area. The regenerated epithelial cells clearly expressed K12, ZO-1, and Desmoplakin with underlying laminin 5 (+) basement membrane. K15 and Ki67 expressions were observed predominantly at the limbal area but not in the regenerated area. α-SMA and vimentin were sporadically expressed in the underlying connective tissue. Conclusions: We speculate that the process of epithelial wound healing at the site of corneal perforation was responsible for migration of the surrounding epithelial cells. Although the regenerated cells expressed several cytokeratins and junctional markers, they remained disorganized and fragile.en_US
dc.identifier.citationCornea. Vol.34, No.11 (2015), 1508-1512en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/ICO.0000000000000551en_US
dc.identifier.issn15364798en_US
dc.identifier.issn02773740en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84944097131en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/36290
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84944097131&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePhenotypic investigation of regenerated epithelial cells after gonococcal corneal perforation: A clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84944097131&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections