Publication:
Drivers of zoonotic disease risk in the Indian subcontinent: A scoping review

dc.contributor.authorAnna Durrance-Bagaleen_US
dc.contributor.authorJames W. Rudgeen_US
dc.contributor.authorNanda Bahadur Singhen_US
dc.contributor.authorSteven R. Belmainen_US
dc.contributor.authorNatasha Howarden_US
dc.contributor.otherTribhuvan Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational University of Singaporeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNatural Resources Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherMid-Western Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:00:08Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:00:08Z
dc.date.issued2021-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractLiterature on potential anthropogenic drivers of zoonotic disease risk in the Indian subcontinent is sparse. We conducted a scoping review to identify primary sources, published 2000–2020, to clarify what research exists and on which areas future research should focus. We summarised findings thematically by disease. Of 80 sources included, 78 (98%) were original research articles and two were conference abstracts. Study designs and methods were not always clearly described, but 74 (93%) were quantitative (including one randomised trial), five (6%) were mixed-methods, and one was qualitative. Most sources reported research from India (39%) or Bangladesh (31%), followed by Pakistan (9%), Nepal (9%), Bhutan and Sri Lanka (6% each). Topically, most focused on rabies (18; 23%), Nipah virus (16; 20%) or leptospirosis (11; 14%), while 12 (15%) did not focus on a disease but instead on knowledge in communities. People generally did not seek post-exposure prophylaxis for rabies even when vaccination programmes were available and they understood that rabies was fatal, instead often relying on traditional medicines. Similarly, people did not take precautions to protect themselves from leptospirosis infection, even when they were aware of the link with rice cultivation. Nipah was correlated with presence of bats near human habitation. Official information on diseases, modes of transmission and prevention was lacking, or shared informally between friends, relatives, and neighbours. Behaviour did not correspond to disease knowledge. This review identifies various human behaviours which may drive zoonotic disease risk in the Indian subcontinent. Increasing community knowledge and awareness alone is unlikely to be sufficient to successfully change these behaviours. Further research, using interdisciplinary and participatory methods, would improve understanding of risks and risk perceptions and thus help in co-designing context-specific, relevant interventions.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOne Health. Vol.13, (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.onehlt.2021.100310en_US
dc.identifier.issn23527714en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85120038803en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77473
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120038803&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDrivers of zoonotic disease risk in the Indian subcontinent: A scoping reviewen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85120038803&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections