Publication:
Efficacy and outcome of simple limbal epithelial transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency verified by epithelial phenotypes integrated with clinical evaluation: Efficacy and outcome of SLET verified by epithelial phenotypes and clinical evaluation

dc.contributor.authorPinnita Prabhasawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorChareenun Chirapapaisanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPanotsom Ngowyutagonen_US
dc.contributor.authorPattama Ekpoen_US
dc.contributor.authorWimolwan Tangpagasiten_US
dc.contributor.authorKaevalin Lekhanonten_US
dc.contributor.authorRosanun Sikarinkulen_US
dc.contributor.authorSutthicha Matamnanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChawikan Boonwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorWarinyupa Pinitpuwadolen_US
dc.contributor.authorRanida Thamphithaken_US
dc.contributor.authorNutchaya Sukonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNutnicha Netien_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Thammasat Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:11:48Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:11:48Z
dc.date.issued2021-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the efficacy and outcome of simple limbal epithelial transplantation (SLET) for limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) using epithelial phenotype detection integrated with clinical manifestation. Methods: This prospective multicenter study included patients with LSCD who underwent autologous SLET (autoSLET) and living-related allogenic SLET (Lr-alloSLET). All patients were assessed by slit-lamp biomicroscopy, in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM), and impression cytology with immunofluorescence staining (ICIF) before and after surgery. The criteria for success were the presence of a clinically non-conjunctivalized cornea and corneal epithelium detected by IVCM or ICIF. Otherwise, the case would be considered a failure. Visual improvement and risk factors for SLET failure were analyzed. Results: A total of 28 eyes of 26 patients (11 autoSLET and 17 Lr-alloSLET) were included. The median age was 53 years (range, 35–63), and the follow-up time was 29.5 months (range, 17.5–39.8). The overall survival rate was 89.3% at 2 years and 75.6% at 3 years with no difference between autoSLET and Lr-alloSLET (p = 0.24). Seven eyes subsequently underwent penetrating keratoplasty. Immunohistochemistry analysis showed that all corneal buttons had corneal epithelium and limbal stem cell markers. Visual improvement was achieved in both SLET groups (p < 0.001). Failed SLET developed between 5 and 32 months postoperatively. However, absolute risk factors for SLET failure were unidentified. Conclusion: The efficacy of autoSLET and Lr-alloSLET for LSCD was excellent. Limbal explants can regenerate and restore the corneal surface while maintaining the characteristics of limbal stem cells as shown by epithelial phenotype detection and immunohistochemistry integrated with clinical evaluation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOcular Surface. Vol.22, (2021), 27-37en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jtos.2021.06.012en_US
dc.identifier.issn19375913en_US
dc.identifier.issn15420124en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85109159987en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/77833
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109159987&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEfficacy and outcome of simple limbal epithelial transplantation for limbal stem cell deficiency verified by epithelial phenotypes integrated with clinical evaluation: Efficacy and outcome of SLET verified by epithelial phenotypes and clinical evaluationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85109159987&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections