Publication:
Short-term evaluation of mini-implant retained removable partial denture.

dc.contributor.authorChatchai Kunavisaruten_US
dc.contributor.authorชัชชัย คุณาวิศรุตen_US
dc.contributor.authorRussami Kumpirichayaen_US
dc.contributor.authorรัศมี คัมภีริชยา
dc.contributor.correspondenceChatchai Kunavisaruten_US
dc.contributor.correspondenceชัชชัย คุณาวิศรุตen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University. Faculty of Dentistry. Department of Advanced General Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-01-27T10:16:23Z
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-05T08:26:48Z
dc.date.available2015-01-27T10:16:23Z
dc.date.available2017-01-05T08:26:48Z
dc.date.created2015-01-07
dc.date.issued2014-09
dc.description.abstractObjective: Mini-implants have been used for various purposes and the survival rate was not different from regular implants when they were used as a single tooth replacement. An analysis of mini-implant retained removable partial dentures (RPD) was never reported. The purposes of the present study were to evaluate mini-implant (2.8-mm-diameter) retained RPD in the short period and to compare patient satisfaction before and after treatment. Material and methods: Nine subjects were given 19 mini-implants to support RPDs. All implants were immediately loaded. Assessments made at recall intervals included: Plaque Index (PI), Gingival Index (GI), probing depth, and standardized radiographs. Implant statuses were classified into success, satisfactory survival, compromised survival, and failure. Patients were asked to complete questionnaires before and after treatment to evaluate patients' satisfaction. Results: Six implants (31.6%) were considered successful, six implants (31.6%) were satisfactory survival, one implant (5.2%) was in a state of compromised survival, and six implants (31.6%) failed to osseointegrate. None of the implants showed signs of peri-implantitis. Clinical parameters demonstrated that there were no correlations between GI, PI and marginal bone loss. Results indicated increased satisfaction in all patients, especially in functional limitation, physical disability and psychological disability domain. Conclusion: The placement of mini-implant to help support removable partial dentures can improve patient’s satisfaction of the denture in various aspects. However, due to reduced bone to implant contact of mini-implant, the high failure rate was found. Therefore it could not be recommended to be use as a routine procedure.en_US
dc.identifier.citationKunavisarut C, Kumpirichaya R. Short-term evaluation of miniimplant retained removable partial denture. M Dent J. 2014; 34(3): 215-24.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0125-5614 (printed)
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/1118
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderFaculty of Dentistry Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.subjectMini-implanten_US
dc.subjectRemovable partial dentureen_US
dc.subjectImplant quality scaleen_US
dc.subjectImplant retained dentureen_US
dc.subjectReduced diameter implanten_US
dc.subjectImplant successen_US
dc.subjectOpen Access articleen_US
dc.subjectวิทยาสารทันตแพทยศาสตร์มหิดล
dc.subjectMahidol Dental Journal
dc.titleShort-term evaluation of mini-implant retained removable partial denture.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-06-26
dspace.entity.typePublication

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
dt-ar-chatchai-2014.pdf
Size:
1.23 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:

Collections