Publication:
Reverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR vs reverse transcriptase quantitative real-time PCR for serum HBV RNA quantification

dc.contributor.authorUmaporn Limothaien_US
dc.contributor.authorNatthaya Chuaypenen_US
dc.contributor.authorKittiyod Poovorawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorWatcharasak Chotiyaputtaen_US
dc.contributor.authorTawesak Tanwandeeen_US
dc.contributor.authorYong Poovorawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPisit Tangkijvanichen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-05T05:29:59Z
dc.date.available2020-05-05T05:29:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA is a novel marker reflecting the activity of covalently closed circular DNA. However, the methodology for detecting HBV RNA has been a technical challenge. In this study, the performance of reverse transcription droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (RT-ddPCR) for quantifying HBV RNA was compared with that of reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) in serum samples collected from treatment-naïve patients with different phases of chronic hepatitis B (CHB). A total of 417 serum samples, including 136 HBeAg-positive CHB and 281 HBeAg-negative CHB were examined. HBV RNA levels measured by RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR showed a high degree of linearity and quantitative correlation. The limit of detections of RT-ddPCR and RT-qPCR assays were 102 and 103 copies/mL, respectively. Our results also demonstrated that RT-ddPCR was superior to RT-qPCR in terms of its consistency for quantifying HBV RNA across all concentrations. In the HBeAg-positive group, serum HBV RNA levels based on RT-ddPCR were moderately correlated with HBV DNA (r = 0.591, P <.001) and HBsAg (r = 0.502, P <.001). Among patients with HBeAg-negative CHB, serum HBV RNA levels were moderately correlated with HBV DNA (r = 0.603, P <.001) but had weak correlation with HBsAg (r = 0.203, P =.001). In summary, RT-ddPCR could enhance the sensitivity of serum HBV RNA detection, particularly among the HBeAg-negative group with low viral loads. Thus, RT-ddPCR could serve as an optimal method for HBV RNA quantification in clinical practice.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Medical Virology. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jmv.25792en_US
dc.identifier.issn10969071en_US
dc.identifier.issn01466615en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85082602379en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/54582
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082602379&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleReverse transcriptase droplet digital PCR vs reverse transcriptase quantitative real-time PCR for serum HBV RNA quantificationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85082602379&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections