Publication:
Current status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomy

dc.contributor.authorChonlada Krutsrien_US
dc.contributor.authorMitsuhiro Kidaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHiroshi Yamauchien_US
dc.contributor.authorTomohisa Iwaien_US
dc.contributor.authorHiroshi Imaizumien_US
dc.contributor.authorWasaburo Koizumien_US
dc.contributor.otherKitasato University Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:40:31Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:40:31Z
dc.date.issued2019-07-14en_US
dc.description.abstract©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy must be performed by a highly experienced endoscopist. The challenges are accessing the afferent limb in different types of reconstruction, cannulating a papilla with a reverse orientation, and performing therapeutic interventions with uncommon endoscopic accessories. The development of endoscopic techniques has led to higher success rates in this group of patients. Device-assisted ERCP is the endoscopic procedure of choice for high success rates in short-limb reconstruction; however, these success rate is lower in long-limb reconstruction. ERCP assisted by endoscopic ultrasonography is now popular because it can be performed independent of the limb length; however, it must be performed by a highly experienced and skilled endoscopist. Stent deployment and small stone removal can be performed immediately after ERCP assisted by endoscopic ultrasonography, but the second session is needed for other difficult procedures such as cholangioscopy-guided electrohydraulic lithotripsy. Laparoscopic-assisted ERCP has an almost 100% success rate in longlimb reconstruction because of the use of a conventional side-view duodenoscope, which is compatible with standard accessories. This requires cooperation between the surgeon and endoscopist and is suitable in urgent situations requiring concomitant cholecystectomy. This review focuses on the advantages, disadvantages, and outcomes of various procedures that are suitable in different situations and reconstruction types. Emerging new techniques and their outcomes are also discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.citationWorld Journal of Gastroenterology. Vol.25, No.26 (2019), 3313-3333en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3748/wjg.v25.i26.3313en_US
dc.identifier.issn22192840en_US
dc.identifier.issn10079327en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85070207911en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/51530
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070207911&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCurrent status of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with surgically altered anatomyen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85070207911&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections