Publication:
The effect of hypothermic machine perfusion and cold storage for kidney preservation

dc.contributor.authorYanee Chusrien_US
dc.contributor.authorGoragoch Gespraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorThananya Khienwaden_US
dc.contributor.authorPhornphop Naiyanateen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-21T07:32:16Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:03:34Z
dc.date.available2018-12-21T07:32:16Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:03:34Z
dc.date.issued2017-12-19en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017 IEEE. Currently, two principles of the kidney preservation (hypothermic machine perfusion; HMP and cold storage; CS) are generally used in kidney transplantation. Both HMP and CS are developed base on the suitable conditions that can maintain the kidney function. In this study, the vascular impedance of kidney was investigated. This experiment aims to comparison the impedance between HMP and CS methods by using a kidney of pig from slaughterhouse. The protocol of impedance estimation, after the kidney was remove from pig (mixed breed pigs), it was gravity flushing to wash blood out. After that, each kidneys were measured impedance before the preservation method. For HMP method, other 3 kidneys were preserved with continuous flow of Euro's Collins preservation solution that maintain pressure around 40 ± 5 mmHg at temperature 4-6 °C for 24 hours. For CS method, 3 kidneys were kept in chamber that filled with Euro's Collins preservation solution at temperature 4-6 °C for 24 hours. After 24 hours, impedance estimation was performed. Results: from the first impedance estimation, both HMP and CS impedances were 0.957±0.95 and 1.024±0.05 mmHg min/ml, respectively. After 24 hours, the impedance of HMP method were higher than CS method (1.059±0.09 and 1.028±0.009 respectively). Conclusion, the kidney preservation using HMP show higher impedance than CS method because the autoregulation in the kidney vascular system that effect to the metabolite phenomenon. Therefore, the HMP preservation can preserving kidneys better than CS preservation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMEiCON 2017 - 10th Biomedical Engineering International Conference. Vol.2017-January, (2017), 1-4en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/BMEiCON.2017.8229128en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85046337275en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/42528
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046337275&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.titleThe effect of hypothermic machine perfusion and cold storage for kidney preservationen_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046337275&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections