Publication: The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; A randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital
Issued Date
2020-04-01
Resource Type
ISSN
19326203
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85083401678
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PLoS ONE. Vol.15, No.4 (2020)
Suggested Citation
Pornrat Chinda, Pulyamon Poomthong, Puriwat Toadithep, Chayanan Thanakiattiwibun, Onuma Chaiwat The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; A randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital. PLoS ONE. Vol.15, No.4 (2020). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231777 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/54431
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
The implementation of a nutrition protocol in a surgical intensive care unit; A randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care hospital
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2020 Chinda et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Background Malnutrition in critically ill patients is linked with significant mortality and morbidity. However, it remains controversial whether nutrition therapy protocols are effective in improving clinical outcomes. The present study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical ICU nutrition protocol, and to compare the hospital mortality, hospital LOS, and ICU LOS of protocol and non-protocol groups. Methods A randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Surgical ICU, Siriraj Hospital. The nutrition administration of the control group was at the discretion of the attending physicians, whereas that of the intervention group followed the "Siriraj Surgical ICU Nutrition Protocol". Details of the demographic data, nutritional data, and clinical outcomes were collected. Results In all, 170 patients underwent randomization, with 85 individuals each in the protocol and non-protocol groups. More than 90% of the patients in both groups were at risk of malnutrition, indicated by a score of ≤ 3 on the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 tool. The average daily calories of the 2 groups were very similar (protocol group, 775.4±342.2 kcal vs. control group, 773.0±391.9 kcal; p = 0.972). However, the median time to commence enteral nutrition was shorter for the protocol group (1.94 days) than the control group (2.25 days; p = 0.503). Enteral nutrition was provided within the first 48 hours to 53.7% of the protocol patients vs. 47.4% of the control patients (p = 0.589). In addition, a higher proportion of the protocol patients (36.5%) reached the 60% calorie-target on Day 4 after admission than that for the non-protocol group (25.9%; p = 0.136). All other clinical outcomes and nutritionrelated complications were not significantly different. Conclusions The implementation of the nutrition protocol did not improve the feeding effectiveness or clinical outcomes as compared to usual nutrition management practices of the Surgical ICU.