Publication:
Nature or nurture? A qualitative study of the source of homosexuality

dc.contributor.authorM. S. Felixen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T02:04:57Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:03:54Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T02:04:57Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:03:54Z
dc.date.issued2016-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© Universiti Putra Malaysia Press. Scholars have debated, asserted and posited that the source of homosexuality in both gay men and lesbian women is found either in nature or nurture. Of specific interest to this research was the self-identified source of homosexuality in gay men through their lived experience. A Malaysian-based context was taken due to the growing interest, both politically and socially, of the social phenomenon of homosexuality in Malaysia. As personal experience was the data source selected for this research and social construction of identity was the perspective taken, phenomenology acted as the theoretical underpinning through which the shared experience of the respondents was analysed. The geographic setting of the research was Penang, Malaysia as it was an urban area that had been identified as having a population of self-identified gay men. A qualitative perspective was taken due to the sensitive nature of the research. The sample population was gathered via purposive sampling and the snowball technique and a total of 33 respondents were recruited. All respondents were interviewed in-depth where a semi-structured interview questionnaire was utilised. All data were transcribed and analysed via a content analysis matrix. The findings suggest that the source of homosexuality for the respondents was nature and not nurture. Respondents attribute their homosexuality to genetics, inborn hormonal influence and biology. However, the findings do point out that nurture has a part to play in the development of self-identified gay men as individuals. Nurturing via friendships, role-modelling and environments that are affirming and positive portrayals of homosexuality in the media allow the respondents to internalise positive attitudes towards their homosexuality. Research into the source of homosexuality from the viewpoint of complementarity as opposed to opposition is a direction that would benefit studies of homosexuality. Longitudinal research would deepen understanding of the source of homosexuality.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol.24, No.4 (2016), 1445-1463en_US
dc.identifier.issn22318534en_US
dc.identifier.issn01287702en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85010664797en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/42864
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85010664797&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectBusiness, Management and Accountingen_US
dc.subjectEconomics, Econometrics and Financeen_US
dc.titleNature or nurture? A qualitative study of the source of homosexualityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85010664797&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections