Publication:
Forensic genetic analysis of bone remain samples

dc.contributor.authorT. Siriboonpiputtanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Rinthachaien_US
dc.contributor.authorJ. Shotivaranonen_US
dc.contributor.authorV. Peonimen_US
dc.contributor.authorB. Rerkamnuaychokeen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:20:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:20:23Z
dc.date.issued2018-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Elsevier B.V. DNA typing from degraded human remains is still challenging forensic DNA scientists not only in the prospective of DNA purification but also in the interpretation of established DNA profiles and data manipulation, especially in mass fatalities. In this report, we presented DNA typing protocol to investigate many skeletal remains in different degrees of decomposing. In addition, we established the grading system aiming for prior determination of the association between levels of decomposing and overall STR amplification efficacy. A total of 80 bone samples were subjected to DNA isolation using the modified DNA IQ™ System (Promega, USA) for bone extraction following with STR analysis using the AmpFLSTR Identifiler ® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). In low destruction group, complete STR profiles were observed as 84.4% whereas partial profiles and non-amplified were found as 9.4% and 6.2%, respectively. Moreover, in medium destruction group, both complete and partial STR profiles were observed as 31.2% while 37.5% of this group was unable to amplify. Nevertheless, we could not purify DNA and were unable to generate STR profile in any sample from the high destroyed bone samples. Compact bones such as femur and humerus have high successful amplification rate superior than loose/spongy bones. Furthermore, costal cartilage could be a designate specimen for DNA isolation in a case of the body that was discovered approximately to 3 days after death which enabled to isolate high quality and quantity of DNA, reduce time and cost, and do not require special tools such as freezer mill.en_US
dc.identifier.citationForensic Science International. Vol.284, (2018), 167-175en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.045en_US
dc.identifier.issn18726283en_US
dc.identifier.issn03790738en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85041466894en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/46877
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041466894&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleForensic genetic analysis of bone remain samplesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85041466894&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections