Publication:
External quality assessment scheme for hiv-1 drug-resistance genotyping in thailand

dc.contributor.authorSiriphan Saeng-Aroonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNonglak Saipraditen_US
dc.contributor.authorRuangchai Loketen_US
dc.contributor.authorNattapong Klamkhaien_US
dc.contributor.authorRatrawee Boonmuangen_US
dc.contributor.authorPavita Kaewprommalen_US
dc.contributor.authorKorrakot Prommajanen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaokazu Takedaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomnuek Sungkanuparphen_US
dc.contributor.authorTatsuo Shiodaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomchai Sangkitpornen_US
dc.contributor.authorKazushi Motomuraen_US
dc.contributor.otherOsaka Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Institutes of Health, Bethesdaen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand National Science and Technology Development Agencyen_US
dc.contributor.otherOsaka Institute of Public Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand-Japan Research Collaboration Center on Emerging and Re-emerging Infections (RCC-ERI)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:16:02Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:16:02Z
dc.date.issued2018-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. The efficacy of antiretroviral (ARV) therapy can be compromised by the emergence and transmission of HIV-1 drug-resistant strains. HIV-1 drug-resistance (DR) genotypic testing thus plays an important role in the selection of optimal treatment regimens for HIV-infected individuals. Given the complexities of the testing procedures and the variety of approaches used, there is considerable potential for results to vary between laboratories. In Thailand, the national External Quality Assessment (EQA) scheme assesses the DR genotype testing performance of laboratories. Here, we evaluated the performance of laboratories in nucleotide sequencing and compared drug-resistance-associated mutations (DRMs) in the HIV-1 protease (PR) and reverse transcriptase (RT) genes during 2010-2015. The EQA samples in the 12 panels showed predominance for the CRF01-AE (85%) and subtype B (15%). Fourteen laboratory datasets were generated: eight using TruGene (TG), two using ViroSeq (VS), and four using in-house (IH) assays. All IH and VS laboratories had penalty scores <7, whereas five of the eight TG laboratories had fluctuating penalty scores. Moreover, seven and six TG laboratories could not amplify the two identical samples, 10B and 10E samples, or the CRF01-AE. Our findings demonstrate the requirement for laboratory participation in the ongoing EQA program and the optimization of kit assays using CRF01-AE samples. Our results also indicate that one advantage of participation is that the laboratories can monitor and investigate the source of laboratory errors.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAIDS Research and Human Retroviruses. Vol.34, No.12 (2018), 1028-1035en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/aid.2017.0299en_US
dc.identifier.issn19318405en_US
dc.identifier.issn08892229en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85058591163en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/45936
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85058591163&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleExternal quality assessment scheme for hiv-1 drug-resistance genotyping in thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85058591163&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections