Publication:
The effect of e-health interventions promoting physical activity in older people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorRick Yiu Cho Kwanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDauda Salihuen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaul Hong Leeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMimi Tseen_US
dc.contributor.authorDaphne Sze Ki Cheungen_US
dc.contributor.authorInthira Roopsawangen_US
dc.contributor.authorKup Sze Choien_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherHong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-02T04:58:09Z
dc.date.available2020-06-02T04:58:09Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-21en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Author(s). Introduction: The objectives of this review paper were to synthesize the data from randomized controlled trials in the literature to come to a conclusion on the effects of e-health interventions on promoting physical activity in older people. Methods: The Medline, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, and SportDiscus databases were searched for articles about studies that 1) recruited subjects with a mean age of > 50 years, 2) tested e-health interventions, 3) employed control groups with no or less advanced e-health strategies, 4) measured physical activity as an outcome, 5) were published between 1st January 2008 and 31st May 2019, and 6) employed randomized controlled trials. The risk of bias in individual studies was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale. To examine the effects of the interventions, variables quantifying the amount of physical activity were extracted. The within-group effects of individual studies were summarized using Hedges g and 95% confidence intervals. Between-group effects were summarized by meta-analyses using RevMan 5.0 with a random effect model. Results: Of the 2810 identified studies, 38 were eligible, 25 were included in the meta-analyses. The within-group effect sizes (Hedges g) of physical activity in the intervention group at T1 ranged from small to large: physical activity time (0.12 to 0.84), step counts (- 0.01 to 11.19), energy expenditure (- 0.05 to 0.86), walking time (0.13 to 3.33), and sedentary time (- 0.12 to - 0.28). The delayed effects as observed in T2 and T3 also ranged from small to large: physical activity time (0.24 to 1.24) and energy expenditure (0.15 to 1.32). In the meta-analysis, the between-group effect of the e-health intervention on physical activity time measured by questionnaires, physical activity time measured by objective wearable devices, energy expenditure, and step counts were all significant with minimal heterogeneity. Conclusion: E-health interventions are effective at increasing the time spent on physical activity, energy expenditure in physical activity, and the number of walking steps. It is recommended that e-health interventions be included in guidelines to enhance physical activity in older people. Further studies should be conducted to determine the most effective e-health strategies.en_US
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Review of Aging and Physical Activity. Vol.17, No.1 (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s11556-020-00239-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn18616909en_US
dc.identifier.issn18137253en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85084394153en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/56255
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084394153&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe effect of e-health interventions promoting physical activity in older people: A systematic review and meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeReviewen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85084394153&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections