Publication:
Validation of the refugee health screener-15 for the assessment of perinatal depression among karen and Burmese women on the Thai-myanmar border

dc.contributor.authorGracia Fellmethen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmma Pluggeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMina Fazelen_US
dc.contributor.authorPrakaykaew Charunwattanaen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrançois Nostenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaymond Fitzpatricken_US
dc.contributor.authorJulie A. Simpsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorRose McGreadyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMelbourne School of Population and Global Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T10:17:43Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T10:17:43Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 Fellmeth et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Perinatal depression is common, and left untreated can have significant and long-lasting consequences for women, their children and their families. Migrant women are at particular risk of perinatal depression as a result of a multitude of stressors experienced before, during and after migration. Identification of perinatal depression among migrant women—particularly those living in low- and middle-income regions—remains challenging, partly due to the lack of locally-validated and culturally appropriate screens tools. This study formally validates Burmese and Sgaw Karen versions of the Refugee Health Screener-15 (RHS-15) as a screening tool for perinatal depression among migrant women living on the Thai-Myanmar border. The Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnosis of DSM-IV Disorders (SCID) was used as the gold-standard comparator. Complete results were obtained for 235 Burmese-speaking and 275 Sgaw Karen-speaking women. Despite displaying reasonable psychometric properties, a number of shortcomings associated with the RHS-15 limited its utility in this setting. The Likert-type response categories of the RHS-15 proved problematic in this low-literacy population. Combined with the relative superiority and greater ease of administration of the SCID, the RHS-15 is not recommended as the tool of choice for detecting perinatal depression in this setting.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.13, No.5 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0197403en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85047420472en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/44770
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047420472&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleValidation of the refugee health screener-15 for the assessment of perinatal depression among karen and Burmese women on the Thai-myanmar borderen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85047420472&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections