Publication:
Cardiac implantable electronic device infection in the cardiac referral center in thailand: Incidence, microbiology, risk factors, and outcomes

dc.contributor.authorTheerawat Korkerdsupen_US
dc.contributor.authorTachapong Ngarmukosen_US
dc.contributor.authorSomnuek Sungkanuparphen_US
dc.contributor.authorAngsana Phuphuakraten_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:30:26Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:30:26Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Authors. Background: Despite the long experience of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in Thailand, epidemiology of CIED infection in Thailand has never been studied. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the cardiac referral center in Thailand to investigate incidence of CIED infection and causative organisms between October 2002 and December 2017. A matched case‐control study was performed to determine the factors associated with CIED infection. Results: Incidence of CIED infection was 0.9% with a stable trend during the studied period. There were 54 episodes of CIED infection. The median (interquartile range) age of the patients was 67.5 (53.0‐75.0) years. A total of 29 (53.7%), 18 (33.3%), and 7 (13.0%) were permanent pacemaker, automatic implantable cardioverter‐defibrillator, and cardio‐resynchronization therapy‐related infection, respectively. Gram‐positive cocci were the most common organism (24 episodes, 44.4%). Gram‐negative bacilli were isolated in six episodes (11.1%). About 9.3% were polymicrobial and 35.2% were culture negative. Multivariate analysis showed that previous CIED infection and generator revision procedure were associated with CIED infection (odds ratio [OR] 48.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.72‐633.62; P = 0.003 and OR 19.99, 95% CI 1.28‐333.24; P = 0.033 respectively). Forty (74.1%) cases were cured. Leaving device in situ was the only factor significantly associated with poor outcome (OR 11.40, 95% CI 1.52‐85.73; P = 0.018). Conclusions: In Thailand, while CIED implantation is rising, incidence of CIED infection is stable. Microbiology of CIED infection in Thailand is similar to western countries, albeit a higher proportion of negative culture. Previous CIED infection and generator revision procedure are associated with CIED infection.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Arrhythmia. Vol.34, No.6 (2018), 632-639en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/joa3.12123en_US
dc.identifier.issn18832148en_US
dc.identifier.issn18804276en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85053865728en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/47062
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053865728&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCardiac implantable electronic device infection in the cardiac referral center in thailand: Incidence, microbiology, risk factors, and outcomesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85053865728&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections