Publication:
The epidemiology of melioidosis in Ubon Ratchatani, Northeast Thailand

dc.contributor.authorY. Suputtamongkolen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. J. Hallen_US
dc.contributor.authorD. A.B. Danceen_US
dc.contributor.authorW. Chaowagulen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Rajchanuvongen_US
dc.contributor.authorM. D. Smithen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. J. Whiteen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherInfectious Disease Epidemiology Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherSappasitthiprasong Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherJohn Radcliffe Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-27T04:27:33Z
dc.date.available2018-02-27T04:27:33Z
dc.date.issued1994-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Melioidosis, or infection with Pseudomonas pseudoniallei is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in South East Asia and Northern Australia. The epidemiology of melioidosis in Ubon Ratchatani, Northeast Thailand was studied over a 5-year period from 1987 to 1991. Methods: Rates and, when possible, the risks of developing melioidosis were calculated. The numerator was the number of culture-proven cases of melioidosis seen in the 1000-bed referral hospital of the province. The denominators were obtained from the population census, a survey of Health, Welfare and Use of Traditional Medicine, and the North Eastern Meteorological Centre, Thailand. Results: The average incidence of human melioldosis was 4.4 (96% confidence interval [Cl]: 3.8-5.0) per 100 000. The disease affected all ages with the highest incidence in 40-60 years olds. Melioidosrs was 1.4 (96% Cl: 0.4-5.3) times more common in males than females. The disease showed a significant seasonal variation in incidence, and a strong linear correlation with rainfall (r = 0.7, 95% Cl: 0.5-0.9) Adults exposed to soil and water in their work (most were rice farmers) had an increased risk of melioidosis(in the 40-59 year age group, relative risk = 4.1, 95% Cl: 2.4-6.9). Most adult patients had an underlying disease (mainly diabetes mellitus) predisposing them to this infection. Conclusions: Melioidosis may result from either acute exposure to the organism in the soil and water, or 're-activation' of an asymptomatic childhood infection (by an unidentified possibly infective seasonal cofactor). The results from this analysis are consistent with both hypotheses. Further epidemiological studies are needed to identify risk factors so that optimal strategies for control of melioidosis may be developed. © 1994 International Epidemiological Association.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Epidemiology. Vol.23, No.5 (1994), 1082-1090en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ije/23.5.1082en_US
dc.identifier.issn03005771en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-0028159236en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/9636
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0028159236&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe epidemiology of melioidosis in Ubon Ratchatani, Northeast Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=0028159236&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections