Publication:
Development of a learning portfolio to assess the competency of anesthesia residents in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorSuwannee Suraseranivongseen_US
dc.contributor.authorThitima Chinachotien_US
dc.contributor.authorNaiyana Aroonpruksakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorPathom Halilamienen_US
dc.contributor.authorPranee Rushatamukayanunten_US
dc.contributor.authorKasana Raksamanien_US
dc.contributor.authorBusara Sirivanasandhaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSahatsa Mandeeen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T07:58:40Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T07:58:40Z
dc.date.issued2011-12-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Recently, a competency-based educational system has been recommended for anesthesia residents in Thailand, instead of a structure-and-process-based medical system. Learning portfolios have become popular and reliable in health profession and education to assess competency and performance in clinical practice. Objectives: Develop a portfolio for learning improvement in first year anesthesia residents in Thailand, and validate this portfolio as a competency evaluation and to identify strength and weakness of implementation. Methods: A learning portfolio was developed from Thai Medical Council general competencies, academic activities, and performance assessment in several modalities. Twenty-four first year anesthesia residents and eight mentors were enrolled for this study. One staff mentored three residents and rated their competencies in portfolios, twice, four-months apart. Content validity was assessed by six content experts. Concurrent validity of portfolio was determined by agreement with faculty global rating and in-training examination. Inter-rater reliability of portfolio was evaluated by five faculties that rated 24 residents. Practicality was commented upon by all mentors and residents in the questionnaire and semi-structure, open-ended questions. Results: All content experts accepted that this portfolio could assess general competencies of the first year anesthesia residents. Concurrent validity of portfolio was demonstrated by high overall agreement with faculty global rating and in-training examination. Inter-rater reliability was good. The majority of mentors and residents ( > 70%) agreed with the benefit of portfolio based on learning development and competency assessment. However, half of residents were not satisfied with the burden from portfolio. Conclusion: The present learning portfolio provided benefit in learning improvement. It was a valid and reliable tool in competency assessment, but a burden, in the views of the residents.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Biomedicine. Vol.5, No.6 (2011), 873-879en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5372/1905-7415.0506.115en_US
dc.identifier.issn1875855Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn19057415en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84871686536en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/11414
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871686536&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleDevelopment of a learning portfolio to assess the competency of anesthesia residents in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84871686536&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections