Publication:
Effect of heated humidification on CPAP therapy adherence in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea with nasopharyngeal symptoms

dc.contributor.authorChuleekorn Soudornen_US
dc.contributor.authorDittapol Munthamen_US
dc.contributor.authorSirimon Reutrakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorNaricha Chirakalwasanen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKing Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Chulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherRajamangala University of Technology systemen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T03:29:22Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:06Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T03:29:22Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:06Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2016 Daedalus Enterprises. BACKGROUND: The addition of heated humidification to CPAP has been shown to improve nasal adverse effects in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). However, current data regarding improvement in CPAP adherence is conflicting. Furthermore, there are no data from a tropical climate area with a high humidity level. METHODS: In this prospective randomized crossover study conducted in Thailand, subjects with moderate to severe OSA with nasopharyngeal symptoms post-split-night study were enrolled in the study. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive CPAP with or without heated humidification for 4 weeks and then crossed over. Information on CPAP adherence, quality of life assessed by the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, nasopharyngeal symptoms assessed by a modified XERO questionnaire, and bedroom ambient humidity and temperature data were obtained. RESULTS: Data were collected on 20 subjects with OSA during the period of January to December 2014. Although the addition of heated humidification appeared to improve average hours of use for all days when compared with conventional CPAP, the difference was not statistically significant (CPAP with heated humidification = 4.6 ± 1.7 h/night; conventional CPAP = 4.0 ± 1.7 h/night, P = .1). However, the addition of heated humidification improved CPAP adherence on the days of use (5.5 ± 1.5 h/night) compared with conventional CPAP (5.2 ± 1.4 h/night), P = .033. Quality of life was also improved according to the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire score (median 17.6 [interquartile range 3.5]) in the heated humidification group compared with conventional CPAP group (median 17.6 [interquartile range 4.5]), P = .046. Significant reduction in the dry throat/sore throat symptom was noted only when CPAP with heated humidification was used. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a tropical climate area, CPAP adherence and quality of life appeared to improve when heated humidification was employed in subjects with moderate to severe OSA with nasopharyngeal symptoms post-split-night polysomnography. The improvement may be related to a reduction in the dry throat/sore throat symptom.en_US
dc.identifier.citationRespiratory Care. Vol.61, No.9 (2016), 1151-1159en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4187/respcare.04536en_US
dc.identifier.issn19433654en_US
dc.identifier.issn00201324en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84985032103en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/41172
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84985032103&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleEffect of heated humidification on CPAP therapy adherence in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea with nasopharyngeal symptomsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84985032103&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections