Publication:
Peritoneal dialysis: Status report in South and South East Asia

dc.contributor.authorVinant Bhargavaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanjiv Jasujaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSydney Chi Wai Tangen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnil K. Bhallaen_US
dc.contributor.authorGaurav Sagaren_US
dc.contributor.authorVivekanand Jhaen_US
dc.contributor.authorRaja Ramachandranen_US
dc.contributor.authorManisha Sahayen_US
dc.contributor.authorSuceena Alexanderen_US
dc.contributor.authorTushar Vachharajanien_US
dc.contributor.authorAida Lydiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMamun Mostafien_US
dc.contributor.authorJayakrishnan K. Pisharamen_US
dc.contributor.authorChakko Jacoben_US
dc.contributor.authorAtma Gunawanen_US
dc.contributor.authorGoh Bak Leongen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhin Thida Thwinen_US
dc.contributor.authorRajendra Kumar Agrawalen_US
dc.contributor.authorKriengsak Vareesangthipen_US
dc.contributor.authorRoberto Tanchancoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLina Choongen_US
dc.contributor.authorChula Herathen_US
dc.contributor.authorChih Ching Linen_US
dc.contributor.authorSyed Fazal Akhtaren_US
dc.contributor.authorAli Alsahowen_US
dc.contributor.authorDevender Singh Ranaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMohan M. Rajapurkaren_US
dc.contributor.authorVijay Kheren_US
dc.contributor.authorShalini Vermaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSampathkumar Krishnaswamyen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmit Guptaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnupam Bahlen_US
dc.contributor.authorAshwani Guptaen_US
dc.contributor.authorUmesh B. Khannaen_US
dc.contributor.authorSantosh Varugheseen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaurizio Gallienien_US
dc.contributor.otherSiriraj Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMinistry of Health Bruneien_US
dc.contributor.otherBir Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherSri Jayewardenepura General Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherOsmania General Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherBrawijaya Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitas Indonesia, RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumoen_US
dc.contributor.otherSindh Institute of Urology and Transplantationen_US
dc.contributor.otherMuljibhai Patel Urological Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherQueen Mary Hospital Hong Kongen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversità degli Studi di Milanoen_US
dc.contributor.otherSir Ganga Ram Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMeenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherCleveland Clinic Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.otherIndraprastha Apollo Hospitalsen_US
dc.contributor.otherSingapore General Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherVeterans General Hospital-Taipeien_US
dc.contributor.otherChristian Medical College, Velloreen_US
dc.contributor.otherPostgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarhen_US
dc.contributor.otherApollo Medics Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherLancelot Kidney and GI Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherBangalore Baptist Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherMedanta Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherClinical Researchen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Dental Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherJahra Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe Medical Cityen_US
dc.contributor.otherGeorge Institute of Global Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherArmed Forces Medical Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.otherHospital Serdangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T09:08:46Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T09:08:46Z
dc.date.issued2021-11-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a modality of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) is largely underutilized globally. We analyzed PD utilization, impact of economic status, projected growth and impact of state policy(s) on PD growth in South Asia and Southeast Asia (SA&SEA) region. Methods: The National Nephrology Societies of the region responded to a questionnaire on KRT practices. The responses were based on the latest registry data, acceptable community-based studies and societal perceptions. The representative countries were divided into high income and higher-middle income (HI & HMI) and low income and lower-middle income (LI & LMI) groups. Results: Data provided by 15 countries showed almost similar percentage of GDP as health expenditure (4%–7%). But there was a significant difference in per capita income (HI & HMI -US$ 28 129 vs. LI & LMI - US$ 1710.2) between the groups. Even after having no significant difference in monthly cost of haemodialysis (HD) and PD in LI & LMI countries, they have poorer PD utilization as compared to HI & HMI countries (3.4% vs. 10.1%); the reason being lack of formal training/incentives and time constraints for the nephrologist while lack of reimbursement and poor general awareness of modalities has been a snag for the patients. The region expects ≥10% PD growth in the near future. Hong Kong and Thailand with ‘PD first’ policy have the highest PD utilization. Conclusion: Important deterrents to PD underutilization were lack of PD centric policies, lackadaisical patient/physician's attitude, lack of structured patient awareness programs, formal training programs and affordability.en_US
dc.identifier.citationNephrology. Vol.26, No.11 (2021), 898-906en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nep.13949en_US
dc.identifier.issn14401797en_US
dc.identifier.issn13205358en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85112668449en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77737
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112668449&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePeritoneal dialysis: Status report in South and South East Asiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85112668449&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections