Publication: Effects of intra-operative positive end-expiratory pressure setting guided by oesophageal pressure measurement on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A randomised controlled trial
Issued Date
2020-11-01
Resource Type
ISSN
13652346
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85092750595
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
European journal of anaesthesiology. Vol.37, No.11 (2020), 1032-1039
Suggested Citation
Annop Piriyapatsom, Sanchai Phetkampang Effects of intra-operative positive end-expiratory pressure setting guided by oesophageal pressure measurement on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A randomised controlled trial. European journal of anaesthesiology. Vol.37, No.11 (2020), 1032-1039. doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000001204 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60033
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Effects of intra-operative positive end-expiratory pressure setting guided by oesophageal pressure measurement on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A randomised controlled trial
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The creation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery can lead to adverse effects on the respiratory system. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) plays an important role in mechanical ventilation during laparoscopic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether PEEP setting guided by oesophageal pressure (Poeso) measurement would affect oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. DESIGN: A randomised controlled study. SETTING: A single-centre trial from March 2018 to June 2018. PATIENTS: Forty-four adult patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological surgery with anticipated duration of surgery more than 2 h. INTERVENTION: PEEP set according to Poeso measurement (intervention group) versus PEEP constantly set at 5 cmH2O (control group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Gas exchange and respiratory mechanics after induction and intubation (T0) and at 15 and 60 min after initiation of pneumoperitoneum (T1 and T2, respectively). RESULTS: PEEP during pneumoperitoneum was significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group (T1, 12.5 ± 1.9 vs. 5.0 ± 0.0 cmH2O and T2, 12.4 ± 1.9 vs. 5.0 ± 0.0 cmH2O, both P < 0.001). Partial pressures of oxygen decreased significantly from baseline during pneumoperitoneum in the control group but not in the intervention group. Nevertheless, the changes in partial pressures of oxygen did not differ between groups. Compliance of the respiratory system (CRS) significantly decreased and driving pressure significantly increased during pneumoperitoneum in both groups. However, the changes in CRS and driving pressure were significantly less in the intervention group. Transpulmonary pressure during expiration was maintained in the intervention group while it decreased significantly in the control group. CONCLUSION: PEEP setting guided by Poeso measurement showed no beneficial effects in terms of oxygenation but respiratory mechanics were better during laparoscopic gynaecological surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03256396.