Publication: The challenge of implementing sustainable tourism policy: a 360-degree assessment of Thailand's “7 Greens sustainable tourism policy”
Issued Date
2015-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
17477646
09669582
09669582
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-84923608069
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol.23, No.4 (2015), 497-516
Suggested Citation
Kaewta Muangasame, Bob McKercher The challenge of implementing sustainable tourism policy: a 360-degree assessment of Thailand's “7 Greens sustainable tourism policy”. Journal of Sustainable Tourism. Vol.23, No.4 (2015), 497-516. doi:10.1080/09669582.2014.978789 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/35687
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
The challenge of implementing sustainable tourism policy: a 360-degree assessment of Thailand's “7 Greens sustainable tourism policy”
Author(s)
Abstract
© 2015, © 2014 Taylor & Francis. It is relatively easy to write sustainable tourism policies, but much harder to implement them. This paper examines the implementation of the Tourism Authority of Thailand's award winning “7 Greens” sustainable tourism policy, announced in 2008, and piloted on the mature destination island of Koh Samui from 2012 onwards, as well as in three other areas. 7 Greens seeks to engage all stakeholders directly and indirectly involved in tourism to work collaboratively for the development of a more sustainable sector. The Tourism Authority feels the Samui pilot case has been successful, but the lead author, adopting a 360-degree survey method, found stakeholders were much more equivocal about the project. The study showed strong in-principle support, but little effective buy-in and even less willingness to take a leadership role. Stakeholders also identified a number of weaknesses in the policy that they felt limited its utility, including a lack of clear objectives, failure to define terms, lack of collaboration between government departments, conflicts between local and national politics, crony capitalism and short-termism, together with the failure to identify measurable metrics and to implement clear evaluation procedures. The paper puts forward several possible ways to improve future implementation programs.