Publication:
Use of wild rodents for environmental monitoring -comparison of rats in Bangkok and rural areas of Thailand

dc.contributor.authorGalayanee Doungchaweeen_US
dc.contributor.authorYuvaluk Khoapraserten_US
dc.contributor.authorSuraphol Kongtimen_US
dc.contributor.authorWitaya Thamaviten_US
dc.contributor.authorKazuo Tajimaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMalcolm A. Mooreen_US
dc.contributor.authorHiroyuki Tsudaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherAichi Cancer Center Hospital and Research Instituteen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Cancer Center Research Instituteen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-24T02:57:55Z
dc.date.available2018-07-24T02:57:55Z
dc.date.issued2002-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThere is a great deal of concern regarding the hazard potential of human exposure to toxic substances and carcinogens as well as infectious agents in the environment. For monitoring purposes fish are well established with regard to aquatic pollution. However, for the human environment, mammalian species might be considered more relevant. As the various types of rats are one of the most common animals sharing human habitants they are natural candidates. In the present study, numbers of such wild rats were trapped in the metropolis of Bangkok and country regions of Thailand for comparison of lesions in the liver and lung which might provide indicators of carcinogens or other hazardous agents in the environment. Glutathione S transferase P form positive foci could be detected in livers, comparable to the laboratory rat case, but without any significant link to site of capture. In contrast, fatty liver and inflammation/cirrhosis were significantly more frequent in animals from the metropolis. Parasite infection also tended to be more prevalent, along with leptospirosis. Inflammatory change was similarly found in the lungs but without any variation between the city and countryside groups. These results suggest that wild rats could be employed as monitors of environmental agents of toxicological significance.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention. Vol.3, No.4 (2002), 367-368en_US
dc.identifier.issn2476762Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn15137368en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-67849131808en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/20105
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67849131808&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleUse of wild rodents for environmental monitoring -comparison of rats in Bangkok and rural areas of Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67849131808&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections