Publication:
Combined effects of noise and styrene on hearing of workers at a company for the bath and toilet production in thailand

dc.contributor.authorIkuharu Moriokaen_US
dc.contributor.authorOrawan Kaewboonchooen_US
dc.contributor.authorChanudda Nabkersonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNobuyuki Miyaien_US
dc.contributor.authorToshio Kawaien_US
dc.contributor.otherWakayama Medical Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherBurapha Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherJapan Industrial Safety and Health Associationen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-09T03:14:37Z
dc.date.available2018-11-09T03:14:37Z
dc.date.issued2014-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstractCombined exposure to both noise and aromatic solvents such as styrene is common in many industries. This study was aimed to clarify the combined effects of noise and styrene on hearing. The subjects were 199 workers (153 males and 46 females) at a company for bath and toilet production in Thailand. Group A (n=38, average age 36.3 years, average work experience 9.2 years) was exposed to noise and solvents. Group B (nl29, average age 36.2 years, average work experience 8.5 years) was exposed to noise. Group C (n=32, average age 37.6 years, average work experience 8.0 years) was officers. All subjects were asked to fill in a questionnaire on characteristics and working conditions. Audiometric threshold testing was performed at the frequencies of 0.5, 1, 2, 4 and 8 kHz in a meeting room. The noise levels and the organic solvents (styrene, acetone) concentrations in the working environment were measured. The results are as follows. The equivalent A-weighted noise level (LAeq) was 7 1.1-94.2 (average 83.7) dB in the Group A room. Forty-five percent of the Group A used no hearing protective equipment. Fifty-eight percent of them had hearing loss. Ninety-two percent of them used the mask for organic solvents. The styrene concentration was exceeding the occupational exposure limit (OEL) with 2 workers, but the acetone concentration was less than the OEL. The LAeq was 73.1-97.2 (average 84.0) dB in the Group B room. Seventy-two percent of the Group B used no hearing protective equipment. Sixty-four percent of them had hearing loss. There was no difference in the prevalence of hearing loss between Group A and Group B. In this study, the combined effects of noise and styrene on hearing were not clearly detected. However, the high prevalence of hearing loss suggests that the company should develop hearing conservation program for workers.en_US
dc.identifier.citation21st International Congress on Sound and Vibration 2014, ICSV 2014. Vol.5, (2014), 4256-4260en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84922710593en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/34930
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84922710593&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.titleCombined effects of noise and styrene on hearing of workers at a company for the bath and toilet production in thailanden_US
dc.typeConference Paperen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84922710593&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections