Publication: Prevalence of malaria and leptospirosis co-infection among febrile patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Issued Date
2021-09-01
Resource Type
ISSN
24146366
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85111019663
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. Vol.6, No.3 (2021)
Suggested Citation
Polrat Wilairatana, Wanida Mala, Pongruj Rattaprasert, Kwuntida Uthaisar Kotepui, Manas Kotepui Prevalence of malaria and leptospirosis co-infection among febrile patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease. Vol.6, No.3 (2021). doi:10.3390/tropicalmed6030122 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77231
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Prevalence of malaria and leptospirosis co-infection among febrile patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
Malaria and leptospirosis are important cosmopolitan infections that have emerged with overlapping geographic distribution, especially in tropical and subtropical regions. Therefore, co-infection with malaria and leptospirosis may occur in overlapping areas. The present study aimed to quantify the prevalence of malaria and leptospirosis co-infection among febrile patients. The association between malaria and leptospirosis infections was also investigated. Relevant studies that had reported malaria and leptospirosis co-infection were identified from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. The risk of bias of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Tool. The pooled prevalence of malaria and leptospirosis co-infections among febrile patients and the pooled prevalence of leptospirosis infection among malaria patients were estimated using random effect models. The association between malaria and leptospirosis infection among febrile patients was estimated using random effect models. The outcomes of each study were shown in a forest plot in point estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity among the included studies was assessed using Cochran’s Q and quantified using I-squared statistics. For leptospirosis, subgroup analyses of countries, diagnostic tests, and participants’ age groups were performed to specify prevalence in each subgroup. Publication bias was assessed by funnel-plot visualization. Of the 2370 articles identified from the databases, 15 studies met the eligibility criteria and were included for qualitative and quantitative syntheses. Most of the included studies were conducted in India (5/15, 33.3%), Thailand (3/15, 20%), and Cambodia (2/15, 13.3%). Most of the enrolled cases were febrile patients (5838 cases) and malaria-positive patients (421 cases). The meta-analysis showed that the pooled prevalence of malaria and leptospirosis co-infection (86 cases) among febrile patients was 1% (95% CI: 1–2%, I2: 83.3%), while the pooled prevalence of leptospirosis infection (186 cases) among malaria patients was 13% (95% CI: 9–18%, I2: 90.3%). The meta-analysis showed that malaria and leptospirosis co-infections occurred by chance (p: 0.434, OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 0.6–3.28, I2: 85.2%). The prevalence of malaria in leptospirosis co-infection among febrile patients in the included studies was low. Co-infection was likely to occur by chance. However, as clinical symptoms of leptospirosis patients were non-specific and not distinguishable from symptoms of malaria patients, clinicians caring for febrile patients in an area where those two diseases are endemic should maintain a high index of suspicion for both diseases and whether mono-infections or co-infections are likely. Recognition of this co-infection may play an important role in reducing disease severity and treatment duration.