Publication: Simultaneous measurement of patient dose and distribution of indoor scattered radiation during digital breast tomosynthesis
Issued Date
2019-02-01
Resource Type
ISSN
15322831
10788174
10788174
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85056465495
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Radiography. Vol.25, No.1 (2019), 72-76
Suggested Citation
T. Nakamura, S. Suzuki, Y. Takei, I. Kobayashi, N. Pongnapang, K. Kato Simultaneous measurement of patient dose and distribution of indoor scattered radiation during digital breast tomosynthesis. Radiography. Vol.25, No.1 (2019), 72-76. doi:10.1016/j.radi.2018.10.006 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51920
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Simultaneous measurement of patient dose and distribution of indoor scattered radiation during digital breast tomosynthesis
Author(s)
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2018 The College of Radiographers Introduction: Breast cancer incidence increases from the age of 30 years. As this age range coincides with that in which women usually pursue pregnancy, undergoing medical examinations for conditions such as breast cancer is a concern, especially when pregnancy is uncertain during the first eight weeks. Moreover, in this age range, breast often exhibits a high density, thus compromising diagnosis. For such density, digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) provides a more accurate diagnosis than 2D mammography given its higher sensitivity and specificity. However, radiation exposure increases during DBT, and it should be determined. Methods: We determined the entrance surface dose, scattered radiation dose, and average glandular dose (AGD), which can be mutually compared following an international protocol. Using our proposed method, the distribution of scattered radiation can be easily and quickly obtained with a minor load to the equipment. Then, we can determine the indoor scattered radiation and surface dose on patients during DBT. Results: We obtained a maximum AGD of 2.32 mGy. The scattered radiation was distributed over both sides with maximum of approximately 40 μGy, whereas the maximum dose around the eye was approximately 10 μGy. Conclusion: By measuring doses using the proposed method, a correct dose information can be provided for patients to mitigate their concerns about radiation exposure. Although the obtained doses were low, their proper management is still required. Overall, the results from this study can help to enhance dose management for patients and safety management regarding indoor radiation.