Publication: Prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate indications for transthoracic echocardiography in adult outpatients at Siriraj hospital
2
Issued Date
2019-01-01
Resource Type
ISSN
22288082
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85063508022
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Siriraj Medical Journal. Vol.71, No.1 (2019), 74-79
Suggested Citation
Kesaree Punlee, Kamol Udol, Vithaya Chaithiraphan, Wandee Rochanasiri, Suteera Phrudprisan, Nithima Ratanasit Prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate indications for transthoracic echocardiography in adult outpatients at Siriraj hospital. Siriraj Medical Journal. Vol.71, No.1 (2019), 74-79. doi:10.33192/Smj.2019.12 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52128
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate indications for transthoracic echocardiography in adult outpatients at Siriraj hospital
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2019 Siriraj Medical Journal. Objective: Ordering transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) for inappropriate indications could prolong patient waiting time, increase echocardiography laboratory workload, and compromise the quality of TTE studies. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of and factors associated with inappropriate indications for TTE in adult outpatients at Siriraj Hospital. Methods: Two cardiologists prospectively and independently evaluated indications for adult TTE scheduled during regular office hours at Her Majesty Cardiac Center, Siriraj Hospital. Cases were classified as appropriate, inappropriate, or uncertain according to the 2011 Appropriate Use Criteria for Echocardiography proposed by a group of American cardiovascular organizations. Agreement between the two cardiologists was measured using weighted kappa statistic, and disagreement was resolved by consensus. Factors were evaluated for association with inappropriate indications for TTE. Results: Four hundred and eighty-two patients were included. Weighted kappa statistic was 0.46 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34 to 0.59] for agreement between the two cardiologists. Four hundred and thirty-two TTE were appropriate (89.6%, 95% CI 86.6% to 92.1%), 27 were inappropriate (5.6%, 95% CI 3.9% to 8.0%), and 23 were uncertain (4.8%, 95% CI 3.2% to 7.0%). Neither status of ordering physician (cardiologist, cardiology fellow, or cardiothoracic surgeon) nor payment type was found to be significantly associated with the appropriateness of indications for TTE. Conclusion: The prevalence of inappropriate indications among adult outpatients undergoing TTE during regular office hours at Siriraj Hospital was low. No significant association was observed between the appropriateness of TTE indications and either status of ordering physician or payment type.