Publication:
Clinical efficacy and safety evaluation of tailoring iron chelation practice in thalassaemia patients from Asia-Pacific: A subanalysis of the EPIC study of deferasirox

dc.contributor.authorVip Viprakasiten_US
dc.contributor.authorHishamshah Ibrahimen_US
dc.contributor.authorShau Yin Haen_US
dc.contributor.authorPhoebe Joy Hoen_US
dc.contributor.authorChi Kong Lien_US
dc.contributor.authorLee Lee Chanen_US
dc.contributor.authorChang Fang Chiuen_US
dc.contributor.authorPranee Sutcharitchanen_US
dc.contributor.authorDany Habren_US
dc.contributor.authorGabor Domokosen_US
dc.contributor.authorBernard Rouberten_US
dc.contributor.authorHong Ling Xueen_US
dc.contributor.authorDonald K. Bowdenen_US
dc.contributor.authorKai Hsin Linen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKuala Lumpur Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of Hong Kongen_US
dc.contributor.otherRoyal Prince Alfred Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherPrince of Wales Hospital Hong Kongen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Malaya Medical Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherChina Medical University Hospital Taichungen_US
dc.contributor.otherChulalongkorn Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporationen_US
dc.contributor.otherNovartis International AGen_US
dc.contributor.otherNovartis Asia Pacific Pharmaceuticals Pte Ltden_US
dc.contributor.otherMonash Medical Centreen_US
dc.contributor.otherNational Taiwan University Hospitalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T08:35:29Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T08:35:29Z
dc.date.issued2011-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough thalassaemia is highly prevalent in the Asia-Pacific region, clinical data on efficacy and safety profiles of deferasirox in patients from this region are rather limited. Recently, data from the multicentre Evaluation of Patients' Iron Chelation with Exjade (EPIC) study in 1744 patients with different anaemias has provided an opportunity to analyse 1115 thalassaemia patients, of whom 444 patients were from five countries in the Asia-Pacific region (AP) for whom thalassaemia management and choice of iron chelators were similar. Compared to the rest of the world (ROW), baseline clinical data showed that the AP group appeared to be more loaded with iron (3745.0 vs. 2822.0 ng/ml) and had a higher proportion on deferoxamine monotherapy prior to the study (82.9 vs. 58.9%). Using a starting deferasirox dose based on transfusional iron intake and tailoring it to individual patient response, clinical efficacy based on serum ferritin reduction in AP and ROW thalassaemia patients was similar. Interestingly, the AP group developed a higher incidence of drug-related skin rash compared to ROW (18.0 vs. 7.2%), which may indicate different pharmacogenetic backgrounds in the two populations. Our analysis confirms that, with appropriate adjustment of dose, deferasirox can be clinically effective across different regions, with manageable side effects. © The Japanese Society of Hematology 2011.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Hematology. Vol.93, No.3 (2011), 319-328en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s12185-011-0789-8en_US
dc.identifier.issn09255710en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-79955865850en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/12631
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79955865850&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleClinical efficacy and safety evaluation of tailoring iron chelation practice in thalassaemia patients from Asia-Pacific: A subanalysis of the EPIC study of deferasiroxen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79955865850&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections