Publication:
Non-endodontic periapical lesions clinically diagnosed as endodontic periapical lesions: A retrospective study over 15 years

dc.contributor.authorTheerachai Kosanwaten_US
dc.contributor.authorSopee Poomsawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorJira Kitisubkanchanaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol University, Faculty of Dentistryen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:30:36Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:30:36Z
dc.date.issued2021-06-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to provide the frequency and demographic data of non-endodontic periapical lesions clinically misdiagnosed as endodontic periapical lesions from a Southeast Asian population over a 15-year period. Material and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted from departmental archives between 2005 and 2019. Cases clinically diagnosed as endodontic periapical lesions were retrieved. Then, cases with a histopathological diagnosis of non-endodontic periapical lesion were selected. Demographic data of non-endodontic periapical lesions were recorded. Radiographic features of cases with available radiographs were analyzed. Results: Of 1,566 cases clinically diagnosed as endodontic periapical lesion, 157 cases received a histopathological diagnosis of non-endodontic origin. Eighteen different histopathological diagnoses were identified. The most frequent lesion was dentigerous cyst (n= 51, 32.48%) followed by odontogenic keratocyst (n=31, 19.75%), nasopalatine duct cyst (n=18, 11.46%) and ameloblastoma (n=15, 9.56%). Three cases of malignant tumors, including adenoid cystic carcinoma, mucoepidermoid carcinoma, and metastatic papillary thyroid carcinoma were observed. Conclusions: Non-endodontic periapical lesions constituted 10.03% of cases clinically diagnosed as endodontic periapical lesions. Histopathological examinations of non-endodontic periapical lesions revealed a variety of lesions ranging from foreign body reaction, cysts, fibro-osseous lesions, benign tumors and primary or metastatic malignant tumors. Of clinical significance is that some non-endodontic periapical lesions had different treatment modalities and prognoses compared with endodontic lesions. Therefore, dentists must be aware that periapical radiolucent lesions are not always a consequence of pulpal necrosis.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry. Vol.13, No.6 (2021), 586-593en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4317/jced.57957en_US
dc.identifier.issn19895488en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85108166684en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76797
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108166684&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectDentistryen_US
dc.titleNon-endodontic periapical lesions clinically diagnosed as endodontic periapical lesions: A retrospective study over 15 yearsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85108166684&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections