Publication:
Refugee and migrant women's views of antenatal ultrasound on the thai burmese border: A mixed methods study

dc.contributor.authorMarcus J. Rijkenen_US
dc.contributor.authorMary Ellen Gilderen_US
dc.contributor.authorMay Myo Thwinen_US
dc.contributor.authorHoney Moon Ladda Kajeechewaen_US
dc.contributor.authorJacher Wiladphaingernen_US
dc.contributor.authorKhin Maung Lwinen_US
dc.contributor.authorCaroline Jonesen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrançois Nostenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRose McGreadyen_US
dc.contributor.otherShoklo Malaria Research Uniten_US
dc.contributor.otherKenyan Medical Research Institute (KEMRI)-Wellcome Trust Research Programmeen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Oxforden_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Clinical Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-11T04:30:52Z
dc.date.available2018-06-11T04:30:52Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-13en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Antenatal ultrasound suits developing countries by virtue of its versatility, relatively low cost and safety, but little is known about women's or local provider's perspectives of this upcoming technology in such settings. This study was undertaken to better understand how routine obstetric ultrasound is experienced in a displaced Burmese population and identify barriers to its acceptance by local patients and providers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Qualitative (30 observations, 19 interviews, seven focus group discussions) and quantitative methods (questionnaire survey with 644 pregnant women) were used to provide a comprehensive understanding along four major themes: safety, emotions, information and communication, and unintended consequences of antenatal ultrasound in refugee and migrant clinics on the Thai Burmese border. One of the main concerns expressed by women was the danger of childbirth which they mainly attributed to fetal malposition. Both providers and patients recognized ultrasound as a technology improving the safety of pregnancy and delivery. A minority of patients experienced transitory shyness or anxiety before the ultrasound, but reported that these feelings could be ameliorated with improved patient information and staff communication. Unintended consequences of overuse and gender selective abortions in this population were not common. Conclusions/Significance: The results of this study are being used to improve local practice and allow development of explanatory materials for this population with low literacy. We strongly encourage facilities introducing new technology in resource poor settings to assess acceptability through similar inquiry. © 2012 This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.en_US
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE. Vol.7, No.4 (2012)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0034018en_US
dc.identifier.issn19326203en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84859731254en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/13466
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859731254&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleRefugee and migrant women's views of antenatal ultrasound on the thai burmese border: A mixed methods studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859731254&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections