Publication: Qualitative detection of avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses: A comparative evaluation of four real-time nucleic acid amplification methods
dc.contributor.author | Wasun Chantratita | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chonlaphat Sukasem | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Supaporn Kaewpongsri | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Chutatip Srichunrusami | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Wantanit Pairoj | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Arunee Thitithanyanont | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Kridsada Chaichoune | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Parntep Ratanakron | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Thaweesak Songserm | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sudarat Damrongwatanapokin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Olfert Landt | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Kasetsart University | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Thailand National Institute of Animal Health | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | TIB MOLBIOL | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-12T02:16:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-07-12T02:16:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008-10-01 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to determine the performance of real-time amplification based methods - NASBA, TaqMan, RT-FRET, and RT-PCR LUX™ formats - for the detection of influenza A (H5N1) virus RNA. In an analysis of 54 samples obtained from a range of animal species in Thailand during the period 2003-2006, results showed that the NASBA (H5 = 98.2%, N1 = 96.3%), TaqMan (H5 = 98.2%, N1 = 96.3%) and FRET (H5 = 98.2%, N1 = 96.3%) had significantly higher rates of positive detection than LUX (H5 = 94.4%, N1 = 50.0%; P < 0.001) for influenza A, H5 and N1 isolates. There were no false-positive results from any methods used in the negative-control group of samples. The limits of analytical detection were at least 10 copies/reaction in real-time NASBA and LUX assays, while FRET and TaqMan assay appeared to be less sensitive at ≥100 copies/reaction. The assays were relatively specific without cross-reactivity to a number of other influenza strains or viral pathogens. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that real-time NASBA, TaqMan and FRET assays can be used to detect influenza A (H5N1) from a wide range of hosts, and be specific for H5N1 samples obtained during different outbreaks (2003-2006). All assays provided the benefit of rapid influenza H5N1 identification for early diagnosis, in the range of hours, and they are well suited to high throughput analyses. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Molecular and Cellular Probes. Vol.22, No.5-6 (2008), 287-293 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.mcp.2008.06.005 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 08908508 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2-s2.0-56749096630 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/18847 | |
dc.rights | Mahidol University | en_US |
dc.rights.holder | SCOPUS | en_US |
dc.source.uri | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=56749096630&origin=inward | en_US |
dc.subject | Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | en_US |
dc.title | Qualitative detection of avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses: A comparative evaluation of four real-time nucleic acid amplification methods | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dspace.entity.type | Publication | |
mu.datasource.scopus | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=56749096630&origin=inward | en_US |