Publication:
Qualitative detection of avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses: A comparative evaluation of four real-time nucleic acid amplification methods

dc.contributor.authorWasun Chantratitaen_US
dc.contributor.authorChonlaphat Sukasemen_US
dc.contributor.authorSupaporn Kaewpongsrien_US
dc.contributor.authorChutatip Srichunrusamien_US
dc.contributor.authorWantanit Pairojen_US
dc.contributor.authorArunee Thitithanyanonten_US
dc.contributor.authorKridsada Chaichouneen_US
dc.contributor.authorParntep Ratanakronen_US
dc.contributor.authorThaweesak Songsermen_US
dc.contributor.authorSudarat Damrongwatanapokinen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlfert Landten_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Thammasat Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherKasetsart Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherThailand National Institute of Animal Healthen_US
dc.contributor.otherTIB MOLBIOLen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-12T02:16:54Z
dc.date.available2018-07-12T02:16:54Z
dc.date.issued2008-10-01en_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to determine the performance of real-time amplification based methods - NASBA, TaqMan, RT-FRET, and RT-PCR LUX™ formats - for the detection of influenza A (H5N1) virus RNA. In an analysis of 54 samples obtained from a range of animal species in Thailand during the period 2003-2006, results showed that the NASBA (H5 = 98.2%, N1 = 96.3%), TaqMan (H5 = 98.2%, N1 = 96.3%) and FRET (H5 = 98.2%, N1 = 96.3%) had significantly higher rates of positive detection than LUX (H5 = 94.4%, N1 = 50.0%; P < 0.001) for influenza A, H5 and N1 isolates. There were no false-positive results from any methods used in the negative-control group of samples. The limits of analytical detection were at least 10 copies/reaction in real-time NASBA and LUX assays, while FRET and TaqMan assay appeared to be less sensitive at ≥100 copies/reaction. The assays were relatively specific without cross-reactivity to a number of other influenza strains or viral pathogens. In conclusion, our study demonstrated that real-time NASBA, TaqMan and FRET assays can be used to detect influenza A (H5N1) from a wide range of hosts, and be specific for H5N1 samples obtained during different outbreaks (2003-2006). All assays provided the benefit of rapid influenza H5N1 identification for early diagnosis, in the range of hours, and they are well suited to high throughput analyses. © 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMolecular and Cellular Probes. Vol.22, No.5-6 (2008), 287-293en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mcp.2008.06.005en_US
dc.identifier.issn08908508en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-56749096630en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/18847
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=56749096630&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.titleQualitative detection of avian influenza A (H5N1) viruses: A comparative evaluation of four real-time nucleic acid amplification methodsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=56749096630&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections