Publication:
Agreement in evaluation of inferior vena cava collapsibility index by medical students using ultrasound compared to emergency physicians

dc.contributor.authorT. Nakornchaien_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Jumpaen_US
dc.contributor.authorO. Ruangsomboonen_US
dc.contributor.authorW. Chaisirinen_US
dc.contributor.authorS. Riyapanen_US
dc.contributor.authorU. Surabenjawongen_US
dc.contributor.authorN. Praphruetkiten_US
dc.contributor.authorT. Chakornen_US
dc.contributor.authorA. Monsomboonen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-26T05:02:19Z
dc.date.available2020-03-26T05:02:19Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL ASSOCIATION OF THAILAND | 2020. Background: An inferior vena cava (IVC) ultrasound is a useful tool for evaluation of fluid status in emergency patients. However, Thai medical students have never been trained to do IVC ultrasound. Objective: To ascertain whether medical students with minimal training could perform IVC ultrasounds. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted among sixth-year medical students who were trained to perform an IVC ultrasound by watching a video clip and doing hands-on practice. The patients, who were older than 18 years and required volume status evaluation, were initially scanned by emergency physicians and then by students. The agreement in IVC measurements between the emergency physicians and the medical students were determined using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Forty medical students performed IVC ultrasounds. A very high inter-observer reliability was observed between IVC collapsibility index (IVC-CI) measured by the students and the physicians (ICC 0.74, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.85). A Bland-Altman plot analysis showed the mean difference in the IVC-CI was 0.89, with a 95% limit of agreement ranging from -33.59% to +31.80%. The sensitivity and specificity of the IVC ultrasounds correlated with the clinical data for evaluation of the hypovolemic status were 95% (95% CI 75.13 to 99.87) and 100% (95% CI 83.16 to 100.00), respectively. Conclusion: After minimal training, the medical students could obtain IVC images; however, their measurement accuracies were poor, as indicated by the wide 95% limit of agreement.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Vol.103, No.1 (2020), 8-13en_US
dc.identifier.issn01252208en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85078172978en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/53821
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078172978&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAgreement in evaluation of inferior vena cava collapsibility index by medical students using ultrasound compared to emergency physiciansen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85078172978&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections