Publication:
The pests of a pest: A systematic review of ectoparasitic fauna among synanthropic rodents in the 21st century with meta-analysis

dc.contributor.authorJeffery Hoen_US
dc.contributor.authorTanasak Changbunjongen_US
dc.contributor.authorThekhawet Weluwanaraken_US
dc.contributor.authorSabir Hussainen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlivier Sparaganoen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahoreen_US
dc.contributor.otherCity University of Hong Kongen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T07:58:26Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T07:58:26Z
dc.date.issued2021-03-01en_US
dc.description.abstractSynanthropic rodents are important urban pests that frequently carry hematophagous ectoparasites. These blood-sucking pests are capable of transmitting epizootic and zoonotic pathogens by landing on one host after feeding on an infected animal. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence of ectoparasites carried by synanthropic rodents and discuss the pathogens that are associated with these external parasites. We searched relevant literatures using predefined criteria in the following databases: EMBASE, PUBMED, Web of Science and Scopus from January 2000 to June 2020. Quality of studies was evaluated using Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Of 35 included studies from 15 countries in Africa, America, Asia, Europe and Oceania, black rats (R. rattus), brown rats (R. norvegicus), pacific rats (R. exulans) and house mice (Mus musculus) were common synanthropic rodents. Mites (Mesostigmata, Sarcoptiformes and Trombidiformes) were the most prevalent (42.6%, 95% CI 26–59.2), followed by ticks (Ixodida) (21.5%, 95% CI 10.5–32.6), lice (Phthiraptera) (17.8%, 95% CI 7.7–27.9) and fleas (Siphonaptera) (14.1%, 95% CI 10.1–18.1). Heterogeneity (I2>96%) across studies was statistically significant. The ectoparasitic fauna was shared considerably by different urban rodent species and appeared to be more diverse in R. rattus and R. norvegicus. Nonetheless, pathogens carried by these ectoparasites were rarely investigated. In conclusion, ectoparasites are ubiquitous in urban-dwelling rodents but our understanding of the epidemiology and the associated pathogens of these parasites remains limited. Further studies are warranted to unravel the pathogen landscape found in rodent-associated ectoparasites.en_US
dc.identifier.citationActa Tropica. Vol.215, (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105802en_US
dc.identifier.issn18736254en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001706Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85098073589en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/75723
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098073589&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectAgricultural and Biological Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectImmunology and Microbiologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectVeterinaryen_US
dc.titleThe pests of a pest: A systematic review of ectoparasitic fauna among synanthropic rodents in the 21st century with meta-analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85098073589&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections