Publication:
Non-invasive high-intensity focused ultrasound for UV-induced hyperpigmentation in Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV: a prospective, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded trial

dc.contributor.authorVasanop Vachiramonen_US
dc.contributor.authorNatthachat Jurairattanapornen_US
dc.contributor.authorSarawin Harnchoowongen_US
dc.contributor.authorPamela Chayavichitsilpen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:24:51Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:24:51Z
dc.date.issued2018-02-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017, Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature. Skin hyperpigmentation is a frequently encountered problem, particularly in darker skin types. Unfortunately, standard treatments for this condition have shown disappointing results. High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is commonly indicated for skin laxity, but recently was used to treat UV-induced hyperpigmentation in animal models. This study is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound for UVB-induced hyperpigmentation in human subjects. A randomized, evaluator-blinded pilot study was conducted on 20 subjects. Each subject was induced three hyperpigmentary spots by local broadband UVB. After 2 weeks, each spot was randomly allocated to control, low-energy, and high-energy HIFU. Subjects were instructed to follow up weekly for a duration of 1 month. Lightness index measurements, mean improvement scores, subjects’ satisfaction, pain scores, and side effects were evaluated. All 20 subjects completed the study. Fourteen subjects had Fitzpatrick (FPT) skin type III and six subjects had FPT skin type IV. Twelve subjects showed greater improvement at control sites while eight subjects showed greater improvement at HIFU-treated sites. In FPT skin type III, HIFU appeared to be inferior to control in both lightness index and mean improvement scores, but in FPT skin type IV, HIFU had greater lightness index improvement and higher improvement scores than control. Side effects were more frequent in high-energy-treated areas. Focused ultrasound may be offered in some patients with hyperpigmentary conditions. More research is needed to determine proper energy settings for optimal outcome.en_US
dc.identifier.citationLasers in Medical Science. Vol.33, No.2 (2018), 361-367en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10103-017-2393-5en_US
dc.identifier.issn1435604Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn02688921en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85034998700en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46960
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85034998700&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleNon-invasive high-intensity focused ultrasound for UV-induced hyperpigmentation in Fitzpatrick skin types III and IV: a prospective, randomized, controlled, evaluator-blinded trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85034998700&origin=inward

Files

Collections