Publication: Why not de-intensification for uterine cervical cancer?
Issued Date
2021-10-01
Resource Type
ISSN
10956859
00908258
00908258
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85110761151
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Gynecologic Oncology. Vol.163, No.1 (2021), 105-109
Suggested Citation
Naoya Murakami, Ken Ando, Masumi Murata, Kazutoshi Murata, Tatsuya Ohno, Tomomi Aoshika, Shingo Kato, Noriyuki Okonogi, Anneyuko I. Saito, Joo Young Kim, Yasuko Kumai, Yasuo Yoshioka, Shuhei Sekii, Kayoko Tsujino, Chairat Lowanichkiattikul, Poompis Pattaranutaporn, Yuko Kaneyasu, Tomio Nakagawa, Miho Watanabe, Takashi Uno, Rei Umezawa, Keiichi Jingu, Ayae Kanemoto, Masaru Wakatsuki, Katsuyuki Shirai, Hiroshi Igaki, Jun Itami Why not de-intensification for uterine cervical cancer?. Gynecologic Oncology. Vol.163, No.1 (2021), 105-109. doi:10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.07.021 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/77829
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Why not de-intensification for uterine cervical cancer?
Author(s)
Naoya Murakami
Ken Ando
Masumi Murata
Kazutoshi Murata
Tatsuya Ohno
Tomomi Aoshika
Shingo Kato
Noriyuki Okonogi
Anneyuko I. Saito
Joo Young Kim
Yasuko Kumai
Yasuo Yoshioka
Shuhei Sekii
Kayoko Tsujino
Chairat Lowanichkiattikul
Poompis Pattaranutaporn
Yuko Kaneyasu
Tomio Nakagawa
Miho Watanabe
Takashi Uno
Rei Umezawa
Keiichi Jingu
Ayae Kanemoto
Masaru Wakatsuki
Katsuyuki Shirai
Hiroshi Igaki
Jun Itami
Ken Ando
Masumi Murata
Kazutoshi Murata
Tatsuya Ohno
Tomomi Aoshika
Shingo Kato
Noriyuki Okonogi
Anneyuko I. Saito
Joo Young Kim
Yasuko Kumai
Yasuo Yoshioka
Shuhei Sekii
Kayoko Tsujino
Chairat Lowanichkiattikul
Poompis Pattaranutaporn
Yuko Kaneyasu
Tomio Nakagawa
Miho Watanabe
Takashi Uno
Rei Umezawa
Keiichi Jingu
Ayae Kanemoto
Masaru Wakatsuki
Katsuyuki Shirai
Hiroshi Igaki
Jun Itami
Other Contributor(s)
Hyogo Cancer Center
National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center
Graduate School of Medicine
Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
Graduate School of Medicine
QST Hospital
Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center
Jichi Medical University
National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi
Cancer Institute Hospital of Japan Foundation for Cancer Research
National Cancer Center Hospital
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Niigata Cancer Center Hospital
Juntendo University School of Medicine
Chiba University Hospital
Kita-Harima Medical Center
National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center
Graduate School of Medicine
Saitama Medical University International Medical Center
Graduate School of Medicine
QST Hospital
Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center
Jichi Medical University
National Cancer Center, Gyeonggi
Cancer Institute Hospital of Japan Foundation for Cancer Research
National Cancer Center Hospital
Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Niigata Cancer Center Hospital
Juntendo University School of Medicine
Chiba University Hospital
Kita-Harima Medical Center
Abstract
Objective: The majority of uterine cervical cancer is known to be related to human papillomavirus (HPV), and HPV-related tumors are known to be radio-sensitive. In the management of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer, de-intensification of treatment has been attempted; however, no such attempt is performed in the management of cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to identify a group of patients who can safely be treated by de-escalated treatment intensity. Methods: From the Asian international multi-institutional retrospective study involving 13 Japanese, one Thailand, and one Korean institutions based on 469 patients, squamous cell carcinoma (Scc), tumor reduction ratio ≥29%, tumor size before brachytherapy ≤4 cm, and total treatment time (TTT) <9 weeks were identified as factors having an influence on local control. Based on these findings, low-risk patients having these four factors were extracted, and treatment outcomes categorized in 10 Gy increment of CTVHR D90 were compared. Results: Among 469 patients, 162 patients (34.5%) met the criteria of low-risk group, and 63, 41, 43, and 15 patients were categorized in CTVHR D90 50–60 Gy, 60–70 Gy, 70–80 Gy, and >80 Gy, respectively. While 4-y progression-free survival ranged from 66 to 80%, 4-y local control was consistently over 90% in every dose group. Rectum and bladder D2cc and incidence of late adverse events decreased as CTVHR D90 decreased. Conclusions: The low-risk patients achieved favorable local control with CTVHR D90 <80 Gy. A personalized treatment strategy based on tumor response could also be adopted for cervical cancer.