Publication:
Prehospital prediction of severe injury in road traffic injuries: A multicenter cross-sectional study

dc.contributor.authorPongsakorn Atiksawedpariten_US
dc.contributor.authorSasivimol Rattanasirien_US
dc.contributor.authorYuwares Sittichanbunchaen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark McEvoyen_US
dc.contributor.authorPaibul Suriyawongpaisalen_US
dc.contributor.authorJohn Attiaen_US
dc.contributor.authorAmmarin Thakkinstianen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Newcastle, Faculty of Health and Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T09:33:26Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T09:33:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2019 The Authors Background: To develop and validate a risk stratification model of severe injury (SI) and death to identify and prioritize road traffic injury (RTI) patients for transportation to an appropriate trauma center (TC). Methods: A 2-phase multicenter-cross-sectional study with prospective data collection was collaboratively conducted using 9 dispatch centers (DC) across Thailand. Among the 9 included DC, 7 and 2 DCs were used for development and validation, respectively. RTI patients who were treated and transported to hospitals by advanced life support (ALS) response units were enrolled. Multiple logistic regression was used to derive risk prediction score of death in 48 h and SI (new injury severity score ≥ 16). Calibration/discrimination performances were explored. Results: A total of 5359 and 2097 RTIs were used for development and external validation, respectively. Seven and 9 predictors among demographic data, mechanism of injury, physic data, EMS operation, and prehospital managements were significant predictors of death and SI, respectively. Risk prediction models fitted well with the developed data (O/E ratios of 1.00 (IQR: 0.69, 1.01) and 0.99 (IQR: 0.95, 1.05) for death and SI, respectively); and the C statistics of 0.966 (0.961, 0.972) and 0.913 (0.905, 0.922). The risk scores were further stratified as low, moderate and high risk. The derive models did not fit well with external data but they were improved after recalibrating the intercepts. However, the model was externally good/excellent discriminated with C statistics from 0.896 (0.871, 0.922) to 0.981 (0.971, 0.991). Conclusion: Risk prediction models of death and SI were developed with good calibration and excellent discrimination. The model should be useful for ALS response units in proper allocation of patients.en_US
dc.identifier.citationInjury. Vol.50, No.9 (2019), 1499-1506en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.injury.2019.05.028en_US
dc.identifier.issn18790267en_US
dc.identifier.issn00201383en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85066495336en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/51442
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066495336&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePrehospital prediction of severe injury in road traffic injuries: A multicenter cross-sectional studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85066495336&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections