Publication: Endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with or without crown restorations: A 5-year retrospective study of survival rates from fracture
Issued Date
2019-11-01
Resource Type
ISSN
20411626
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85075805295
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry. Vol.10, No.4 (2019), e12426
Suggested Citation
Titalee Jirathanyanatt, Warattama Suksaphar, Danuchit Banomyong, Yaowaluk Ngoenwiwatkul Endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with or without crown restorations: A 5-year retrospective study of survival rates from fracture. Journal of investigative and clinical dentistry. Vol.10, No.4 (2019), e12426. doi:10.1111/jicd.12426 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/50704
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with or without crown restorations: A 5-year retrospective study of survival rates from fracture
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. AIM: The aim of the present study was to investigate survival rates from fracture of endodontically treated posterior teeth (ETT) restored with or without crowns with recall periods of up to 5 years. METHODS: ETT with single-unit crown or resin composite restorations were studied based on the inclusion criteria. Restoration, tooth structure loss, adjacent teeth, fracture, and restorability were recorded. Survival rates from fracture were calculated, and risk factors were identified. RESULTS: Overall, survival rate of ETT with crowns (92.2%) was significantly higher than resin composites (77.4%) (P < 0.05). ETT with one or two surface loss/es and two adjacent teeth had a high survival rate of 86.9%, which was not significantly different to ETT with crowns (P ≥ 0.05). Restoration and adjacent teeth were identified as significant factors. The majority of fractured ETT with resin composites were restorable, whereas those with crowns were unrestorable. Survival rates from unrestorable fracture were not significantly different between the crown (93.1%) and resin composite (96%) (P ≥ 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The survival rate from the fracture of ETT restored with crowns was significantly higher than ETT restored with resin composites, but was not significantly different to ETT with one or two ETT with one or two surface loss/es and two adjacent teeth. ETT restored with resin composites had mostly restorable fracture, whereas ETT with unrestorable fracture were similar between the two restorations.