How to produce a scientist

Abstract

This essay explores, on the basis of personal experiences and those of friends and colleagues, what causes young people to commit themselves to a career in scientific research, a question of interest to policy makers, educators and parents. I argue that an inclination and ability to do science is partly innate, but is not necessarily indicated by very high IQ. The home environment probably has more influence on the development of scientific interests and a scientific attitude than does formal schooling with its emphasis on rote learning and obedience. The most critical subjects required for development of scientific ability, beyond exposure to basic science, are English and mathematics, subjects that are weak in Thai schools. Among the qualities of successful scientists are an argumentative spirit and the ability to communicate, learn from others and cooperate in research. International cooperation and teamwork are vital to solving scientific problems facing the global community. I suggest that the "Science Olympics" competitions be altered to promote development of a cooperative spirit and international teamwork in science; at present, they reward only rote learning and individual effort, and are not structured to test true scientific potential or to reward any sort of scientific achievement.