Publication:
Combined isobutylamido thiazolyl resorcinol and low-fluence Q-switched Nd: YAG laser for the treatment of facial hyperpigmentation: A randomized, split-face study

dc.contributor.authorVasanop Vachiramonen_US
dc.contributor.authorKanchana Leerunyakulen_US
dc.contributor.authorChaninan Kositkuljornen_US
dc.contributor.authorPamela Chayavichitsilpen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-18T10:57:23Z
dc.date.available2020-11-18T10:57:23Z
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC Background: Isobutylamido thiazolyl resorcinol (ITR) is a novel anti-tyrosinase recently shown to be effective in the treatment of hyperpigmentation. Low-fluence Q-switched Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser (LFQS) has proven to be effective for various hyperpigmentary conditions. However, there is no study on the efficacy and safety of combined ITR and LFQS treatment. Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of combined ITR and LFQS with LFQS monotherapy for facial hyperpigmentation. Materials and Methods: Patients with symmetrical facial hyperpigmentation were treated with five sessions of once weekly LFQS on the whole face. One side was randomly treated with ITR and the other side received a placebo cream for 12 weeks. Patients were followed for 8 weeks after the last laser treatment. Relative lightness index (RL*I), Facial Hyperpigmentation Severity Score on the malar area (FHSSm), patient satisfaction, recurrence, and adverse events were recorded. Results: Twenty-four patients completed the study. Both sides demonstrated significant reductions of mean RL*I and mean FHSSm from baseline (P <.01). At the 4th week, the ITR-treated side showed more improvement of mean RL*I than the placebo-treated side (62.5% vs 47.3% improvement, P <.05). The mean FHSSm on the ITR-treated was reduced at a significantly higher percentage than the placebo-treated side (54.4% vs 40.2% reduction, P <.05). Partial recurrence was observed on both sides. No serious side effects were noted. Conclusion: Combined ITR and LFQS therapy was more superior than LFQS monotherapy in the treatment of facial hyperpigmentation. ITR may serve as adjuvant for patients with such condition.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cosmetic Dermatology. (2020)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jocd.13790en_US
dc.identifier.issn14732165en_US
dc.identifier.issn14732130en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85094194549en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/60104
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85094194549&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleCombined isobutylamido thiazolyl resorcinol and low-fluence Q-switched Nd: YAG laser for the treatment of facial hyperpigmentation: A randomized, split-face studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85094194549&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections