Publication:
The effect of low-dose oral vitamin K supplementation on INR stability in patients receiving warfarin: A randomised trial

dc.contributor.authorKochawan Boonyawaten_US
dc.contributor.authorLuqi Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorAlejandro Lazo-Langneren_US
dc.contributor.authorMichael J. Kovacsen_US
dc.contributor.authorErik Yeoen_US
dc.contributor.authorTerri Schnurren_US
dc.contributor.authorSam Schulmanen_US
dc.contributor.authorMark A. Crowtheren_US
dc.contributor.otherMcMaster Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherWestern Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Torontoen_US
dc.contributor.otherSt. Joseph's Healthcare Hamiltonen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-11T03:29:24Z
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-14T08:02:07Z
dc.date.available2018-12-11T03:29:24Z
dc.date.available2019-03-14T08:02:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© Schattauer 2016. The anticoagulant effect of warfarin is influenced by variations in vitamin K intake. Concomitant use of daily low-dose oral vitamin K (LDVK) and warfarin may improve INR stability. We hypothesise that administration of LDVK improves INR control. To test this hypothesis we performed a multi-centre, placebo-controlled, randomised trial conducted at four university-affiliated hospitals in Canada. Patients on chronic warfarin therapy received oral vitamin K 150 mcg daily or a matching placebo for a total of six months after a one-month run in period. The primary outcome was a comparison of mean time in therapeutic range (TTR) in LDVK and placebo group during a six-monthperiod. The secondary outcome was number of INR excursions <1.5 or >4.5. There was no significant difference in the final TTR between the two groups (65.1 % vs 66 %, p =0.8). Mean TTR in both LDVK and placebo groups were statistically increased compared with prior to the study. The number of INR excursions were significantly decreased in the LDVK group (9.4 % and 5.4 %, absolute difference [pre- minus post-] = 4 %, 95 % CI, 2 to 6 %, p-value <0.001). We conclude that LDVK administration did not increase mean TTR, but did decrease the number of INR excursions. The observed improvement in mean TTR in both groups suggests that more attentive monitoring of warfarin therapy, rather than LDVK, was responsible for the improvement in TTR observed. The reduced excursions suggest that LDVK did reduce extreme INR variation. The study is registered at www.ClinicalTrial.gov# NCT00990158.en_US
dc.identifier.citationThrombosis and Haemostasis. Vol.116, No.3 (2016), 480-485en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1160/TH16-04-0320en_US
dc.identifier.issn03406245en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-84989172865en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/41189
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84989172865&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleThe effect of low-dose oral vitamin K supplementation on INR stability in patients receiving warfarin: A randomised trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84989172865&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections