Publication:
Intestinal failure after bariatric surgery: Treatment and outcome at a single-intestinal rehabilitation and transplant center

dc.contributor.authorWethit Dumronggittiguleen_US
dc.contributor.authorElizabeth A. Marcusen_US
dc.contributor.authorBernard J. DuBrayen_US
dc.contributor.authorRobert S. Venicken_US
dc.contributor.authorErik Dutsonen_US
dc.contributor.authorDouglas G. Farmeren_US
dc.contributor.otherVA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare Systemen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLAen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-27T10:37:40Z
dc.date.available2020-01-27T10:37:40Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-01en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 American Society for Bariatric Surgery Background: Though intestinal failure (IF) after bariatric surgery (BS) is uncommon, its prevalence is increasing. However, data on the outcomes for these patients are limited. Objectives: To analyze the outcomes of treatment for patients with IF after BS. Setting: University hospital. Methods: A single-center analysis (1991–2016) of outcomes according to treatment arms established by a multidisciplinary team. Results: Twenty-five IF patients were identified (median age 45 yr). BS was 92% Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The major cause of IF was volvulus/internal hernia (72%). Median time from BS to IF was 48 months. Treatment arms were intestinal rehabilitation (IR, n = 15), transplantation (TXP, n = 5), and parenteral nutrition (PN, n = 5). For IR, median bowel length was 60 cm. Forty-six percent ultimately discontinued PN. Twenty-seven percent were partially weaned PN and 27% failed IR. Common surgical rehabilitation was Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reversal and restoration of gastrointestinal continuity. The 5-year overall survival was 74%. For TXP, 7 patients were listed for TXP (5 initially and 2 after failed IR). Three underwent TXP, 2 isolated intestine and 1 isolated liver. Three were delisted (1 improvement and 2 death). For PN, 6 patients required long-term PN (5 initially and 1 after failed IR). Four patients are alive currently. Conclusions: IF after BS is an increasing problem facing IR centers. Internal hernia is the major cause. Surgical IR is the first-line therapy and affords the best outcome. TXP is reserved for rescuing patients who failed IR or develop PN complications. Long-term PN is suitable for patients in whom IR or TXP is impractical.en_US
dc.identifier.citationSurgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. Vol.15, No.1 (2019), 98-108en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.soard.2018.10.014en_US
dc.identifier.issn18787533en_US
dc.identifier.issn15507289en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85059833444en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/52355
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059833444&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleIntestinal failure after bariatric surgery: Treatment and outcome at a single-intestinal rehabilitation and transplant centeren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059833444&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections