Publication:
Application of the European quality indicators for psychosocial dementia care in long-term care facilities in the Asia-Pacific region: a pilot study

dc.contributor.authorYun Hee Jeonen_US
dc.contributor.authorWai Tong Chienen_US
dc.contributor.authorJu Young Haen_US
dc.contributor.authorRahimah Ibrahimen_US
dc.contributor.authorBelinda Kirleyen_US
dc.contributor.authorLay Ling Tanen_US
dc.contributor.authorPapan Thaipisuttikulen_US
dc.contributor.authorEmmelyne Vasseen_US
dc.contributor.authorMyrra Vernooij-Dassenen_US
dc.contributor.authorHuali Wangen_US
dc.contributor.authorJong Chul Younen_US
dc.contributor.authorHenry Brodatyen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of New South Wales (UNSW) Australiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherThe University of Sydneyen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversiti Putra Malaysiaen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPeking Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherSeoul National Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherChangi General Hospitalen_US
dc.contributor.otherHong Kong Polytechnic Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherPusan National Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherRadboud University Nijmegen Medical Centreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T11:40:12Z
dc.date.available2019-08-23T11:40:12Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-03en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2017, © 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Objectives: An Asia-Pacific regional collaboration group conducted its first multi-country research project to determine whether or not European quality indicators (QIs) for psychosocial care in dementia could be implemented as a valid tool in residential aged care across seven Asia-Pacific sites (Australia, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Mainland China, Malaysia, Singapore, South Korea, and Thailand). Method: Following the European QI protocol, auditing and data extraction of medical records of consenting residents with dementia were conducted by trained auditors with relevant health care backgrounds. Detailed field notes by the auditors were also obtained to describe the characteristics of the participating care facilities, as well as key issues and challenges encountered, for each of the 12 QIs. Results: Sixteen residential care facilities in the seven Asia-Pacific sites participated in this study. Data from 275 residents’ records revealed each of the 12 Qis’ endorsement varied widely within and between the study sites (0%–100%). Quality of the medical records, family and cultural differences, definitions and scoring of certain indicators, and time-consuming nature of the QI administration were main concerns for implementation. Conclusion: Several items in the European QIs in the current format were deemed problematic when used to measure the quality of psychosocial care in the residential aged care settings in participating Asia-Pacific countries. We propose refinements of the European QIs for the Asian-Pacific context, taking into account multiple factors identified in this study. Our findings provide crucial insights for future research and implementation of psychosocial dementia care QIs in this region.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAging and Mental Health. Vol.22, No.10 (2018), 1279-1286en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13607863.2017.1351521en_US
dc.identifier.issn13646915en_US
dc.identifier.issn13607863en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85024405146en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46253
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85024405146&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectNursingen_US
dc.titleApplication of the European quality indicators for psychosocial dementia care in long-term care facilities in the Asia-Pacific region: a pilot studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85024405146&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections