Publication:
Lung Ultrasound Assessment of Focal and Non-focal Lung Morphology in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

dc.contributor.authorCharalampos Pierrakosen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarry R. Smiten_US
dc.contributor.authorLuigi Pisanien_US
dc.contributor.authorFrederique Paulusen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarcus J. Schultzen_US
dc.contributor.authorJean Michel Constantinen_US
dc.contributor.authorDavide Chiumelloen_US
dc.contributor.authorFrancesco Mojolien_US
dc.contributor.authorSilvia Mongodien_US
dc.contributor.authorLieuwe D.J. Bosen_US
dc.contributor.otherCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugmann, Brusselsen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversità degli Studi di Milanoen_US
dc.contributor.otherFondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteoen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversità degli Studi di Paviaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherNuffield Department of Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.otherSorbonne Universiteen_US
dc.contributor.otherAmsterdam UMC - University of Amsterdamen_US
dc.contributor.otherASST Santi Paolo e Carloen_US
dc.contributor.otherGeneral Regional Hospital F. Miullien_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-04T08:05:40Z
dc.date.available2022-08-04T08:05:40Z
dc.date.issued2021-09-14en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The identification of phenotypes based on lung morphology can be helpful to better target mechanical ventilation of individual patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to assess the accuracy of lung ultrasound (LUS) methods for classification of lung morphology in critically ill ARDS patients under mechanical ventilation. Methods: This was a post hoc analysis on two prospective studies that performed LUS and chest computed tomography (CT) scanning at the same time. Expert panels from the two participating centers separately developed two LUS methods for classifying lung morphology based on LUS aeration scores from a 12-region exam (Amsterdam and Lombardy method). Moreover, a previously developed LUS method based on anterior LUS scores was tested (Piedmont method). Sensitivity and specificity of all three LUS methods was assessed in the cohort of the other center(s) by using CT as the gold standard for classification of lung morphology. Results: The Amsterdam and Lombardy cohorts consisted of 32 and 19 ARDS patients, respectively. From these patients, 23 (45%) had focal lung morphology while others had non-focal lung morphology. The Amsterdam method could classify focal lung morphology with a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 100%, while the Lombardy method had a sensitivity and specificity of 100 and 61%. The Piedmont method had a sensitivity and specificity of 91 and 75% when tested on both cohorts. With both the Amsterdam and Lombardy method, most patients could be classified based on the anterior regions alone. Conclusion: LUS-based methods can accurately classify lung morphology in invasively ventilated ARDS patients compared to gold standard chest CT. The anterior LUS regions showed to be the most discriminant between focal and non-focal lung morphology, although accuracy increased moderately when lateral and posterior LUS regions were integrated in the method.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Physiology. Vol.12, (2021)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fphys.2021.730857en_US
dc.identifier.issn1664042Xen_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85116053093en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/76025
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116053093&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleLung Ultrasound Assessment of Focal and Non-focal Lung Morphology in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndromeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85116053093&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections