Publication:
Prevalence, motivations, and adverse effects of vaginal practices in Africa and Asia: Findings from a multicountry household survey

dc.contributor.authorTerence Hullen_US
dc.contributor.authorAdriane Martin Hilberen_US
dc.contributor.authorMatthew F. Chersichen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrigitte Bagnolen_US
dc.contributor.authorAree Prohmmoen_US
dc.contributor.authorJennifer A. Smiten_US
dc.contributor.authorNinuk Widyantoroen_US
dc.contributor.authorIwu Dwisetyani Utomoen_US
dc.contributor.authorIsabelle Françoisen_US
dc.contributor.authorNazarius Mbona Tumwesigyeen_US
dc.contributor.authorMarleen Temmermanen_US
dc.contributor.otherAustralian National Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversitat Bernen_US
dc.contributor.otherSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH)en_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversity of Witwatersranden_US
dc.contributor.otherUniversiteit Genten_US
dc.contributor.otherMahidol Universityen_US
dc.contributor.otherWomen's Health Foundationen_US
dc.contributor.otherInternational Centre for Reproductive Health-Mozambiqueen_US
dc.contributor.otherMakerere Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-03T08:30:14Z
dc.date.available2018-05-03T08:30:14Z
dc.date.issued2011-07-01en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Women worldwide use various vaginal practices to clean or modify their vulva and vagina. Additional population-level information is needed on prevalence and motivations for these practices, characteristics of users, and their adverse effects. Methods: This was a household survey using multistage cluster sampling in Tete, Mozambique; KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; Yogyakarta, Indonesia; and Chonburi, Thailand. In 2006-2007, vaginal practices and their motivations were examined using structured interviews with women 18-60 years of age (n=3610). Results: Prevalence, frequency, and motivations varied markedly. Two thirds of women in Yogyakarta and Chonburi reported one or more practices. In Yogyakarta, nearly half ingest substances with vaginal effects, and in Chonburi, external washing and application predominate. In Tete, half reported three or four current practices, and a quarter reported five or more practices. Labial elongation was near universal, and 92% of those surveyed cleanse internally. Two third's in KwaZulu-Natal practiced internal cleansing. Insertion of traditional solid products was rare in Chonburi and Yogyakarta, but one tenth of women in KwaZulu-Natal and nearly two thirds of women in Tete do so. Multivariate analysis of the most common practice in each site showed these were more common among less educated women in Africa and young urban women in Asia. Explicit sexual motivations were frequent in KwaZulu-Natal and Tete, intended for pleasure and maintaining partner commitment. Practices in Chonburi and Yogyakarta were largely motivated by femininity and health. Genital irritation was common at African sites. Conclusions: Vaginal practices are not as rare, exotic, or benign as sometimes assumed. Limited evidence of their biomedical consequences remains a concern; further investigation of their safety and sexual health implications is warranted. Copyright © 2011, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Women's Health. Vol.20, No.7 (2011), 1097-1109en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/jwh.2010.2281en_US
dc.identifier.issn1931843Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn15409996en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-79960208237en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/123456789/12461
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79960208237&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titlePrevalence, motivations, and adverse effects of vaginal practices in Africa and Asia: Findings from a multicountry household surveyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=79960208237&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections