Publication:
Accuracy and the factors influencing the accuracy of death certificates completed by first-year general practitioners in Thailand

dc.contributor.authorChaiwat Washirasaksirien_US
dc.contributor.authorPrateep Raksasagulwongen_US
dc.contributor.authorCharoen Chouriyaguneen_US
dc.contributor.authorPochamana Phisalprapaen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeerachai Srivanichakornen_US
dc.contributor.otherFaculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol Universityen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T06:04:16Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T06:04:16Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-20en_US
dc.description.abstract© 2018 The Author(s). Background: Although death certificates (DCs) provide valuable health information which may help to guide local health policies and priorities, there is little information concerning their validity in Thailand. First-year general practitioners (GPs) have a major role in DC completion, especially in provincial general hospitals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and factors influencing the accuracy of DCs completed by first-year GPs in Thailand, compared with the cause of death (COD) derived from medical records by experts. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at 14 provincial general hospitals in Thailand during the June 2011 to May 2012 study period. Medical records and DCs completed by first-year GPs who graduated from 16 Thai medical schools were sampled. The cause of death recorded on the DCs was compared with the medical conditions and histories derived from patient medical records. A cross-sectional survey of the 210 GPs who completed the DCs reviewed in this study was also conducted. Respondent GPs' demographic characteristics, factors associated with COD, and COD coding system were evaluated. Results: Five hundred and sixty-three medical records and corresponding DCs were included. Of those, 36.9% of DCs were found to be correct. Common mistakes included incorrect sequence of events leading to death (32.4%), and mode of death use (26.2%). Of the 210 GPs, 155 questionnaires were completed and returned. The mean time spent on recording COD and completing DCs in the medical school curriculum was 2.1 ± 0.9 h and only 27.7% of participants had experience in completing DCs by themselves during medical school. Mean medical school GPA was significantly higher in the correctly completed DC GPs group than in the incorrectly completed DC GPs group (3.3 ± 0.4 vs. 3.2 ± 0.3; p = 0.03). However, no significant difference was found for other factors associated with COD between groups. Conclusions: This is the first study documenting gaps and disparities in DC accuracy, and factors influencing completion of DCs among first-year GPs in Thailand, based on a clinical assessment of medical records. GPs made errors on 63.1% of DCs. This finding suggests that proven education, system-related support, and additional training interventions specific to DC completion are required.en_US
dc.identifier.citationBMC Health Services Research. Vol.18, No.1 (2018)en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-018-3289-1en_US
dc.identifier.issn14726963en_US
dc.identifier.other2-s2.0-85048823543en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/46585
dc.rightsMahidol Universityen_US
dc.rights.holderSCOPUSen_US
dc.source.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048823543&origin=inwarden_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.titleAccuracy and the factors influencing the accuracy of death certificates completed by first-year general practitioners in Thailanden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
mu.datasource.scopushttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85048823543&origin=inwarden_US

Files

Collections