Publication: Peripapillary perfused capillary density in true versus pseudoexfoliation syndrome: An OCTA study
Issued Date
2020-12-01
Resource Type
ISSN
19326203
Other identifier(s)
2-s2.0-85097819371
Rights
Mahidol University
Rights Holder(s)
SCOPUS
Bibliographic Citation
PLoS ONE. Vol.15, No.12 December (2020)
Suggested Citation
Phantaraporn Tangtammaruk, Purit Petpiroon, Wasu Supakonatanasan, Chaiwat Teekhasaenee, Yanin Suwan Peripapillary perfused capillary density in true versus pseudoexfoliation syndrome: An OCTA study. PLoS ONE. Vol.15, No.12 December (2020). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0239109 Retrieved from: https://repository.li.mahidol.ac.th/handle/20.500.14594/60338
Research Projects
Organizational Units
Authors
Journal Issue
Thesis
Title
Peripapillary perfused capillary density in true versus pseudoexfoliation syndrome: An OCTA study
Other Contributor(s)
Abstract
© 2020 Tangtammaruk et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Purpose To compare peripapillary perfused capillary density (PCD) among eyes with true exfoliation syndrome (TEX), eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX), and healthy control eyes. Materials and methods In this observational cross-sectional study, eyes with and without TEX or PEX were assessed by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) imaging. Bilateral OCTA images (4.5 × 4.5 mm2) centered at the optic nerve head were obtained using a commercial spectral domain OCTA system. Optic nerve head perfusion was quantified using the split-spectrum amplitude decorrelation angiography algorithm. Categorical and continuous variables were compared using the chi-squared test and one-way analysis of variance, respectively. The generalized estimating equation was used to adjust for confounding factors and determine inter-ocular associations. Results We enrolled 39 eyes with TEX, 31 eyes with PEX, and 32 control eyes. There were no significant differences among the three groups regarding age, intraocular pressure, cup-to-disc ratio, blood pressure, or axial length (all p>0.05). There were significant differences in global PCD among the three groups (p = 0.01). There were significant differences in annular PCD between the TEX and PEX groups (p = 0.027). Conclusions While both global and annular PCDs did not differ between the TEX and control groups, greater loss of annular PCD in the PEX group than in the TEX and control groups suggests more pronounced microvascular disturbance in PEX. Synopsis/Precis Greater microvascular attenuation in PEX compared with TEX and normal control measured by OCTA.